Chapter 616: 616
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
At the Oscars, the public suddenly realized.
It turns out that the contradiction between westrow system and Hurst group has existed for a long time.
Three years ago, in order to get rid of the heavy debt burden caused by the merger of Reynolds nabesk, Reynolds nabesk group chose to sell a large number of its assets, including 20% of the shares of ESPN, a famous sports television station of metmet / ABC Group.
Danielis entertainment is very optimistic about the development of cable TV, so it chose to bid. Hurst group, which is in the process of diversified transformation, also intends to bid for these shares.
At that time, igrit was in the early stage of its development, and igrit portal needed the support of news and information content from traditional paper media.
Hurst group offered content support to igrit portal as a bargaining chip in exchange for Denise Entertainment's initiative to give up its bid for ESPN shares, and finally successfully pocketed these shares.
However, after getting the equity of ESPN, Hurst group turned back and refused to fulfill its original promise of cooperation for fear that the Internet media would affect the interests of the traditional paper media industry.
As a result, disputes between the two sides arose.
The article also specifically mentions that danilisi Entertainment's offer for the equity of ESPN was as high as $200 million at that time. After giving up, Hurst group reached a deal with only $180 million, saving $20 million, including another tax avoidance operation of no less than $20 million.
However, after taking a big advantage, Hurst group is not satisfied. It is not only unwilling to fulfill the initial commitment of cooperation, but also thinks that the bidding of danielis Entertainment Group makes Hurst group pay more money for ESPN shares in disguised form. Therefore, it has been using its media to launch attacks on westrow system.
For example, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of Hurst group, has been in direct confrontation with the westero system in recent years.
The source of the conflict is the recent disturbances.
Congressman David Melrose, who is supported by the Hurst family, constantly uses his power to try to launch improper investigations into new technology companies in the westero system. The reason is not to protect the interests of the majority of voters, nor is it the so-called monopoly accusation against these companies. The root cause is just the news information, classified information and social networks provided by igritte company Such free Internet services hurt the interests of traditional paper media giants like Hurst group.
As evidence, the New York Post article also included a picture of William Hurst III and Congressman David Merlot hanging out at a cocktail party, looking like a good friend.
For the public readers, compared with a lot of serious posing, this photo is obviously full of "collusion" atmosphere, which has great lethality, and instantly makes many people identify the potential tendency.
Members of Congress elected by one vote are still the spokesmen of the rich and powerful.
For this report, David Merlot, a spokesman of Hurst group, immediately became the focus of media and public attention, also jumped out to refute, but the effect was obviously not significant.
Following the article in the New York Post, igritte portal has published more articles about David Merlot's interest relationship with the Hurst family. This congressman, who has been re elected for three terms, has received a large number of political donations from the Hurst group in the past three elections. This year's impact is not only that. As the political spokesman of the Hurst family, David Merlot is still here recently Urge Congress to lift the "ban on cross media ownership" that restricts the media from having too much say. Once the ban disappears, the news and information that the American people have daily access to may be controlled by a few media giants, which will be a strong blow to the freedom of the press.
It can be said that the "double standards" of this congressman between promoting the monopoly of traditional media and cracking down on the emerging Internet industry are absolutely shameless.
While Hurst group and David merroth are struggling to deal with the disclosure of this article, another related article in the Wall Street Journal has also attracted a lot of people's attention.
"Do you want to be a friend or an enemy?"
The report did not comment on the inside story of the conflict between the Hurst group and the westrow system, but analyzed in detail the possible impact of the incident.
Hurst is not a public company, but it also publishes results.
In 1993, Hurst group's total revenue was US $2.11 billion, with a growth rate of 9% and an annual net profit of US $169 million, with an annual growth rate of 12% and a net profit rate of 8%.
Like the American automobile industry, traditional paper media groups are restricted by many trade unions, but they can't transfer their production bases overseas. Therefore, the operating cost is quite high. Hurst group can maintain a net profit margin of 8%, which has exceeded the average level of the industry.
Now, just for the westrow system, the cumulative advertising budget of 65 million US dollars invested in Hurst group in the past year has accounted for 3% of the other party's annual revenue. All this revenue has disappeared, which will have a significant impact on the performance of Hurst group in 1994.
Furthermore, if Simon westero uses the influence of westero system to ask other partners to "stand in line", the additional negative impact will be at least twice as much as westero system itself.According to the 9% revenue growth of Hurst group in 1993, once the conflict between the two sides continues, it is likely that the revenue growth of Hurst group in 1994 will stop completely.
For the traditional paper media industry, which has gradually begun to show a declining trend, stagnant revenue growth actually means retrogression.
After all, whether it is based on inflation or the natural growth of workers' wages and other factors, a company must ensure considerable performance growth every year in order to maintain the normal operation of the enterprise.
Once the growth of business revenue stagnates, the continuous increase of inflation, employee wages and even debt burden will not stagnate. The first impact is the enterprise profits.
When profits are gradually offset by the negative impact of stagnant revenue growth, there will be a series of chain reactions, such as layoffs, sales of business, spending cuts and so on.
If the situation has not improved, it will eventually go bankrupt.
Reynolds and nabesk, which used to be industry giants with excellent revenue and profit performance, are on the verge of bankruptcy in the last two years because of a series of chain reactions caused by the huge debts brought by the merger five years after the record US $33 billion merger.
Super giants like Reynolds nabesk are likely to decline rapidly, not to mention the much smaller Hurst group. Therefore, the Wall Street Journal judges that if Hurst group fails to resolve the conflict as soon as possible, even if it lasts only one year, it will have a serious negative impact on the operation of Hurst group.
In contrast, in addition to the public opinion pressure and litigation risk, the westrow system, which is more than 100 times larger than the Hurst group, will hardly suffer any substantial damage.
After all, Simon westrow's current wealth has already reached $200 billion, while the total wealth of the Hurst family, the five grandchildren of William Hurst in those years, is less than $2.5 billion, which is more than 80 times the gap.
What's more, the media empire owned by the Hurst family, which used to scare many politicians, celebrities and rich people, is obviously not powerful enough in the face of the westero system.
Not to mention the igritte portal owned by the westero system, Simon westero had just made a "friend" comparable to the strength of the Hurst group, the New York Times Group, before he banned the Hurst group.
With the rapid development of the Internet industry, the westero system is inevitable for the traditional media to successfully complete the transformation to the digital era.
The New York Times Group has undoubtedly made a very wise choice.
Although it is obvious that Simon westero intends to control the traditional paper media to avoid the continuous deterioration of media opinion against westero system in the near future, the other party's return to the New York Times Group is also rich. Simply giving up the exclusive right of the news and information content of igritte portal directly makes many people monopolize the Internet for westero system The media's accusations have lost their roots.
Most importantly, the achievement of this cooperation will lead to more and more traditional media groups that are still criticizing the westero system to gradually reverse their attitude, so as to change their orientation to the transformation of the digital era.
So the next question is, do you want to be a friend or an enemy to the westero system?
The news of the New York Post naturally came from the arrangement of the westrow system, and Simon was surprised by the report of the Wall Street Journal.
However, it's just a bit of an accident.
For western capitalist society, capital really represents everything.
Westrow system vs Hurst group.
Even if the conflict between the two sides leads to Simon's loss of $10 billion, it only accounts for 5% of his personal wealth. In this process, the Hurst family, whose total assets are less than $2.5 billion, may have lost everything.
On the other hand, the westrow system has already had a positive effect on the Hurst group in just a few days.
Since the beginning of this month, due to the dual pressure of the media and political circles, the shares of Cisco and AOL, the two listed core Internet companies of the westero system, have started to fluctuate and fall, with a cumulative decline of more than 5% as of last Friday.
Based on the market value of the two companies, which are already close to $60 billion, more than 5% of the stock price decline means that shareholders of both companies have to bear more than $3 billion in Book losses.
The cooperation plan between igritte and the New York Times Group, which was suddenly exposed on Monday, together with the fact that westrow system changed its defensive position in the past few weeks to challenge Hurst group strongly, strongly stimulated the market's confidence in westrow system, and triggered the stock price rebound of Cisco and AOL.
Cisco and AOL's previous share price declines were just due to the capital market's concern that the government authorities may respond to the pressure of public opinion. The financial performance and high growth of the two companies are doomed that they are unlikely to collapse.
Now, with the New York Times Group turning to the side of the westrow system, the Hurst group has been hit hard by Simon westrow, and its form has been rapidly reversed.Just three days from Monday to Wednesday, the stock prices of Cisco and AOL have recovered to the highest level before the shock at the beginning of the month.
At the beginning of trading on Thursday morning, Cisco's share price broke through again, and its total market value broke through the $60 billion mark.
By 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, the market value of Cisco had reached as high as US $61.5 billion, followed by AOL, which also reached US $57.3 billion. Driven by these two leading technology stocks, the NASDAQ technology stock market rose all over the board, up 1.7% on the same day. At the beginning of this year,
began to think that a large number of hedge funds which had serious bubbles in the Internet industry had suffered heavy losses since March.
reluctantly persisted until March. With the series of storms surrounding the vistle system, all the capital saw the "dawn" of the technology bubble burst. After a few weeks, the short sellers made a massive comeback, but unexpectedly, from the beginning of March 21st, a short period of three weeks, the short term book profits had disappeared and turned straight into losses.
Cersei capital's cersei fund management company from the beginning of the year for the technology sector long position size has not been less than $5 billion.
Since the beginning of March, with the reactivation of a large number of short positions, cersei fund management company has taken the opportunity to increase the total number of long positions to US $12 billion.
With strong financial support and only three to five times of low leverage, the short-term decline of Cisco, AOL and other stocks did not make cersei fund management company burst.
Now, it's just the strong rebound of technology stocks in recent days. Cersei fund management company's book loss of more than 600 million US dollars has been quickly wiped out, and further generated a lot of profits.
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
At the Oscars, the public suddenly realized.
It turns out that the contradiction between westrow system and Hurst group has existed for a long time.
Three years ago, in order to get rid of the heavy debt burden caused by the merger of Reynolds nabesk, Reynolds nabesk group chose to sell a large number of its assets, including 20% of the shares of ESPN, a famous sports television station of metmet / ABC Group.
Danielis entertainment is very optimistic about the development of cable TV, so it chose to bid. Hurst group, which is in the process of diversified transformation, also intends to bid for these shares.
At that time, igrit was in the early stage of its development, and igrit portal needed the support of news and information content from traditional paper media.
Hurst group offered content support to igrit portal as a bargaining chip in exchange for Denise Entertainment's initiative to give up its bid for ESPN shares, and finally successfully pocketed these shares.
However, after getting the equity of ESPN, Hurst group turned back and refused to fulfill its original promise of cooperation for fear that the Internet media would affect the interests of the traditional paper media industry.
As a result, disputes between the two sides arose.
The article also specifically mentions that danilisi Entertainment's offer for the equity of ESPN was as high as $200 million at that time. After giving up, Hurst group reached a deal with only $180 million, saving $20 million, including another tax avoidance operation of no less than $20 million.
However, after taking a big advantage, Hurst group is not satisfied. It is not only unwilling to fulfill the initial commitment of cooperation, but also thinks that the bidding of danielis Entertainment Group makes Hurst group pay more money for ESPN shares in disguised form. Therefore, it has been using its media to launch attacks on westrow system.
For example, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of Hurst group, has been in direct confrontation with the westero system in recent years.
The source of the conflict is the recent disturbances.
Congressman David Melrose, who is supported by the Hurst family, constantly uses his power to try to launch improper investigations into new technology companies in the westero system. The reason is not to protect the interests of the majority of voters, nor is it the so-called monopoly accusation against these companies. The root cause is just the news information, classified information and social networks provided by igritte company Such free Internet services hurt the interests of traditional paper media giants like Hurst group.
As evidence, the New York Post article also included a picture of William Hurst III and Congressman David Merlot hanging out at a cocktail party, looking like a good friend.
For the public readers, compared with a lot of serious posing, this photo is obviously full of "collusion" atmosphere, which has great lethality, and instantly makes many people identify the potential tendency.
Members of Congress elected by one vote are still the spokesmen of the rich and powerful.
For this report, David Merlot, a spokesman of Hurst group, immediately became the focus of media and public attention, also jumped out to refute, but the effect was obviously not significant.
Following the article in the New York Post, igritte portal has published more articles about David Merlot's interest relationship with the Hurst family. This congressman, who has been re elected for three terms, has received a large number of political donations from the Hurst group in the past three elections. This year's impact is not only that. As the political spokesman of the Hurst family, David Merlot is still here recently Urge Congress to lift the "ban on cross media ownership" that restricts the media from having too much say. Once the ban disappears, the news and information that the American people have daily access to may be controlled by a few media giants, which will be a strong blow to the freedom of the press.
It can be said that the "double standards" of this congressman between promoting the monopoly of traditional media and cracking down on the emerging Internet industry are absolutely shameless.
While Hurst group and David merroth are struggling to deal with the disclosure of this article, another related article in the Wall Street Journal has also attracted a lot of people's attention.
"Do you want to be a friend or an enemy?"
The report did not comment on the inside story of the conflict between the Hurst group and the westrow system, but analyzed in detail the possible impact of the incident.
Hurst is not a public company, but it also publishes results.
In 1993, Hurst group's total revenue was US $2.11 billion, with a growth rate of 9% and an annual net profit of US $169 million, with an annual growth rate of 12% and a net profit rate of 8%.
Like the American automobile industry, traditional paper media groups are restricted by many trade unions, but they can't transfer their production bases overseas. Therefore, the operating cost is quite high. Hurst group can maintain a net profit margin of 8%, which has exceeded the average level of the industry.
Now, just for the westrow system, the cumulative advertising budget of 65 million US dollars invested in Hurst group in the past year has accounted for 3% of the other party's annual revenue. All this revenue has disappeared, which will have a significant impact on the performance of Hurst group in 1994.
Furthermore, if Simon westero uses the influence of westero system to ask other partners to "stand in line", the additional negative impact will be at least twice as much as westero system itself.According to the 9% revenue growth of Hurst group in 1993, once the conflict between the two sides continues, it is likely that the revenue growth of Hurst group in 1994 will stop completely.
For the traditional paper media industry, which has gradually begun to show a declining trend, stagnant revenue growth actually means retrogression.
After all, whether it is based on inflation or the natural growth of workers' wages and other factors, a company must ensure considerable performance growth every year in order to maintain the normal operation of the enterprise.
Once the growth of business revenue stagnates, the continuous increase of inflation, employee wages and even debt burden will not stagnate. The first impact is the enterprise profits.
When profits are gradually offset by the negative impact of stagnant revenue growth, there will be a series of chain reactions, such as layoffs, sales of business, spending cuts and so on.
If the situation has not improved, it will eventually go bankrupt.
Reynolds and nabesk, which used to be industry giants with excellent revenue and profit performance, are on the verge of bankruptcy in the last two years because of a series of chain reactions caused by the huge debts brought by the merger five years after the record US $33 billion merger.
Super giants like Reynolds nabesk are likely to decline rapidly, not to mention the much smaller Hurst group. Therefore, the Wall Street Journal judges that if Hurst group fails to resolve the conflict as soon as possible, even if it lasts only one year, it will have a serious negative impact on the operation of Hurst group.
In contrast, in addition to the public opinion pressure and litigation risk, the westrow system, which is more than 100 times larger than the Hurst group, will hardly suffer any substantial damage.
After all, Simon westrow's current wealth has already reached $200 billion, while the total wealth of the Hurst family, the five grandchildren of William Hurst in those years, is less than $2.5 billion, which is more than 80 times the gap.
What's more, the media empire owned by the Hurst family, which used to scare many politicians, celebrities and rich people, is obviously not powerful enough in the face of the westero system.
Not to mention the igritte portal owned by the westero system, Simon westero had just made a "friend" comparable to the strength of the Hurst group, the New York Times Group, before he banned the Hurst group.
With the rapid development of the Internet industry, the westero system is inevitable for the traditional media to successfully complete the transformation to the digital era.
The New York Times Group has undoubtedly made a very wise choice.
Although it is obvious that Simon westero intends to control the traditional paper media to avoid the continuous deterioration of media opinion against westero system in the near future, the other party's return to the New York Times Group is also rich. Simply giving up the exclusive right of the news and information content of igritte portal directly makes many people monopolize the Internet for westero system The media's accusations have lost their roots.
Most importantly, the achievement of this cooperation will lead to more and more traditional media groups that are still criticizing the westero system to gradually reverse their attitude, so as to change their orientation to the transformation of the digital era.
So the next question is, do you want to be a friend or an enemy to the westero system?
The news of the New York Post naturally came from the arrangement of the westrow system, and Simon was surprised by the report of the Wall Street Journal.
However, it's just a bit of an accident.
For western capitalist society, capital really represents everything.
Westrow system vs Hurst group.
Even if the conflict between the two sides leads to Simon's loss of $10 billion, it only accounts for 5% of his personal wealth. In this process, the Hurst family, whose total assets are less than $2.5 billion, may have lost everything.
On the other hand, the westrow system has already had a positive effect on the Hurst group in just a few days.
Since the beginning of this month, due to the dual pressure of the media and political circles, the shares of Cisco and AOL, the two listed core Internet companies of the westero system, have started to fluctuate and fall, with a cumulative decline of more than 5% as of last Friday.
Based on the market value of the two companies, which are already close to $60 billion, more than 5% of the stock price decline means that shareholders of both companies have to bear more than $3 billion in Book losses.
The cooperation plan between igritte and the New York Times Group, which was suddenly exposed on Monday, together with the fact that westrow system changed its defensive position in the past few weeks to challenge Hurst group strongly, strongly stimulated the market's confidence in westrow system, and triggered the stock price rebound of Cisco and AOL.
Cisco and AOL's previous share price declines were just due to the capital market's concern that the government authorities may respond to the pressure of public opinion. The financial performance and high growth of the two companies are doomed that they are unlikely to collapse.
Now, with the New York Times Group turning to the side of the westrow system, the Hurst group has been hit hard by Simon westrow, and its form has been rapidly reversed.Just three days from Monday to Wednesday, the stock prices of Cisco and AOL have recovered to the highest level before the shock at the beginning of the month.
At the beginning of trading on Thursday morning, Cisco's share price broke through again, and its total market value broke through the $60 billion mark.
By 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, the market value of Cisco had reached as high as US $61.5 billion, followed by AOL, which also reached US $57.3 billion. Driven by these two leading technology stocks, the NASDAQ technology stock market rose all over the board, up 1.7% on the same day. At the beginning of this year,
began to think that a large number of hedge funds which had serious bubbles in the Internet industry had suffered heavy losses since March.
reluctantly persisted until March. With the series of storms surrounding the vistle system, all the capital saw the "dawn" of the technology bubble burst. After a few weeks, the short sellers made a massive comeback, but unexpectedly, from the beginning of March 21st, a short period of three weeks, the short term book profits had disappeared and turned straight into losses.
Cersei capital's cersei fund management company from the beginning of the year for the technology sector long position size has not been less than $5 billion.
Since the beginning of March, with the reactivation of a large number of short positions, cersei fund management company has taken the opportunity to increase the total number of long positions to US $12 billion.
With strong financial support and only three to five times of low leverage, the short-term decline of Cisco, AOL and other stocks did not make cersei fund management company burst.
Now, it's just the strong rebound of technology stocks in recent days. Cersei fund management company's book loss of more than 600 million US dollars has been quickly wiped out, and further generated a lot of profits.
At the Oscars, the public suddenly realized. It turns out that the contradiction between westrow system and Hurst group has existed for a long time. Three years ago, in order to get rid of the heavy debt burden caused by the merger of Reynolds nabesk, Reynolds nabesk group chose to sell a large number of its assets, including 20% of the shares of ESPN, a famous sports television station of metmet / ABC Group. Danielis entertainment is very optimistic about the development of cable TV, so it chose to bid. Hurst group, which is in the process of diversified transformation, also intends to bid for these shares. At that time, igrit was in the early stage of its development, and igrit portal needed the support of news and information content from traditional paper media. Hurst group offered content support to igrit portal as a bargaining chip in exchange for Denise Entertainment's initiative to give up its bid for ESPN shares, and finally successfully pocketed these shares. However, after getting the equity of ESPN, Hurst group turned back and refused to fulfill its original promise of cooperation for fear that the Internet media would affect the interests of the traditional paper media industry. As a result, disputes between the two sides arose. The article also specifically mentions that danilisi Entertainment's offer for the equity of ESPN was as high as $200 million at that time. After giving up, Hurst group reached a deal with only $180 million, saving $20 million, including another tax avoidance operation of no less than $20 million. However, after taking a big advantage, Hurst group is not satisfied. It is not only unwilling to fulfill the initial commitment of cooperation, but also thinks that the bidding of danielis Entertainment Group makes Hurst group pay more money for ESPN shares in disguised form. Therefore, it has been using its media to launch attacks on westrow system. For example, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of Hurst group, has been in direct confrontation with the westero system in recent years. The source of the conflict is the recent disturbances. Congressman David Melrose, who is supported by the Hurst family, constantly uses his power to try to launch improper investigations into new technology companies in the westero system. The reason is not to protect the interests of the majority of voters, nor is it the so-called monopoly accusation against these companies. The root cause is just the news information, classified information and social networks provided by igritte company Such free Internet services hurt the interests of traditional paper media giants like Hurst group. As evidence, the New York Post article also included a picture of William Hurst III and Congressman David Merlot hanging out at a cocktail party, looking like a good friend. For the public readers, compared with a lot of serious posing, this photo is obviously full of "collusion" atmosphere, which has great lethality, and instantly makes many people identify the potential tendency. Members of Congress elected by one vote are still the spokesmen of the rich and powerful. For this report, David Merlot, a spokesman of Hurst group, immediately became the focus of media and public attention, also jumped out to refute, but the effect was obviously not significant. Following the article in the New York Post, igritte portal has published more articles about David Merlot's interest relationship with the Hurst family. This congressman, who has been re elected for three terms, has received a large number of political donations from the Hurst group in the past three elections. This year's impact is not only that. As the political spokesman of the Hurst family, David Merlot is still here recently Urge Congress to lift the "ban on cross media ownership" that restricts the media from having too much say. Once the ban disappears, the news and information that the American people have daily access to may be controlled by a few media giants, which will be a strong blow to the freedom of the press. It can be said that the "double standards" of this congressman between promoting the monopoly of traditional media and cracking down on the emerging Internet industry are absolutely shameless. While Hurst group and David merroth are struggling to deal with the disclosure of this article, another related article in the Wall Street Journal has also attracted a lot of people's attention. "Do you want to be a friend or an enemy?" The report did not comment on the inside story of the conflict between the Hurst group and the westrow system, but analyzed in detail the possible impact of the incident. Hurst is not a public company, but it also publishes results. In 1993, Hurst group's total revenue was US $2.11 billion, with a growth rate of 9% and an annual net profit of US $169 million, with an annual growth rate of 12% and a net profit rate of 8%. Like the American automobile industry, traditional paper media groups are restricted by many trade unions, but they can't transfer their production bases overseas. Therefore, the operating cost is quite high. Hurst group can maintain a net profit margin of 8%, which has exceeded the average level of the industry. Now, just for the westrow system, the cumulative advertising budget of 65 million US dollars invested in Hurst group in the past year has accounted for 3% of the other party's annual revenue. All this revenue has disappeared, which will have a significant impact on the performance of Hurst group in 1994. Furthermore, if Simon westero uses the influence of westero system to ask other partners to "stand in line", the additional negative impact will be at least twice as much as westero system itself.According to the 9% revenue growth of Hurst group in 1993, once the conflict between the two sides continues, it is likely that the revenue growth of Hurst group in 1994 will stop completely. For the traditional paper media industry, which has gradually begun to show a declining trend, stagnant revenue growth actually means retrogression. After all, whether it is based on inflation or the natural growth of workers' wages and other factors, a company must ensure considerable performance growth every year in order to maintain the normal operation of the enterprise. Once the growth of business revenue stagnates, the continuous increase of inflation, employee wages and even debt burden will not stagnate. The first impact is the enterprise profits. When profits are gradually offset by the negative impact of stagnant revenue growth, there will be a series of chain reactions, such as layoffs, sales of business, spending cuts and so on. If the situation has not improved, it will eventually go bankrupt. Reynolds and nabesk, which used to be industry giants with excellent revenue and profit performance, are on the verge of bankruptcy in the last two years because of a series of chain reactions caused by the huge debts brought by the merger five years after the record US $33 billion merger. Super giants like Reynolds nabesk are likely to decline rapidly, not to mention the much smaller Hurst group. Therefore, the Wall Street Journal judges that if Hurst group fails to resolve the conflict as soon as possible, even if it lasts only one year, it will have a serious negative impact on the operation of Hurst group. In contrast, in addition to the public opinion pressure and litigation risk, the westrow system, which is more than 100 times larger than the Hurst group, will hardly suffer any substantial damage. After all, Simon westrow's current wealth has already reached $200 billion, while the total wealth of the Hurst family, the five grandchildren of William Hurst in those years, is less than $2.5 billion, which is more than 80 times the gap. What's more, the media empire owned by the Hurst family, which used to scare many politicians, celebrities and rich people, is obviously not powerful enough in the face of the westero system. Not to mention the igritte portal owned by the westero system, Simon westero had just made a "friend" comparable to the strength of the Hurst group, the New York Times Group, before he banned the Hurst group. With the rapid development of the Internet industry, the westero system is inevitable for the traditional media to successfully complete the transformation to the digital era. The New York Times Group has undoubtedly made a very wise choice. Although it is obvious that Simon westero intends to control the traditional paper media to avoid the continuous deterioration of media opinion against westero system in the near future, the other party's return to the New York Times Group is also rich. Simply giving up the exclusive right of the news and information content of igritte portal directly makes many people monopolize the Internet for westero system The media's accusations have lost their roots. Most importantly, the achievement of this cooperation will lead to more and more traditional media groups that are still criticizing the westero system to gradually reverse their attitude, so as to change their orientation to the transformation of the digital era. So the next question is, do you want to be a friend or an enemy to the westero system? The news of the New York Post naturally came from the arrangement of the westrow system, and Simon was surprised by the report of the Wall Street Journal. However, it's just a bit of an accident. For western capitalist society, capital really represents everything. Westrow system vs Hurst group. Even if the conflict between the two sides leads to Simon's loss of $10 billion, it only accounts for 5% of his personal wealth. In this process, the Hurst family, whose total assets are less than $2.5 billion, may have lost everything. On the other hand, the westrow system has already had a positive effect on the Hurst group in just a few days. Since the beginning of this month, due to the dual pressure of the media and political circles, the shares of Cisco and AOL, the two listed core Internet companies of the westero system, have started to fluctuate and fall, with a cumulative decline of more than 5% as of last Friday. Based on the market value of the two companies, which are already close to $60 billion, more than 5% of the stock price decline means that shareholders of both companies have to bear more than $3 billion in Book losses. The cooperation plan between igritte and the New York Times Group, which was suddenly exposed on Monday, together with the fact that westrow system changed its defensive position in the past few weeks to challenge Hurst group strongly, strongly stimulated the market's confidence in westrow system, and triggered the stock price rebound of Cisco and AOL. Cisco and AOL's previous share price declines were just due to the capital market's concern that the government authorities may respond to the pressure of public opinion. The financial performance and high growth of the two companies are doomed that they are unlikely to collapse. Now, with the New York Times Group turning to the side of the westrow system, the Hurst group has been hit hard by Simon westrow, and its form has been rapidly reversed.Just three days from Monday to Wednesday, the stock prices of Cisco and AOL have recovered to the highest level before the shock at the beginning of the month. At the beginning of trading on Thursday morning, Cisco's share price broke through again, and its total market value broke through the $60 billion mark. By 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, the market value of Cisco had reached as high as US $61.5 billion, followed by AOL, which also reached US $57.3 billion. Driven by these two leading technology stocks, the NASDAQ technology stock market rose all over the board, up 1.7% on the same day. At the beginning of this year, began to think that a large number of hedge funds which had serious bubbles in the Internet industry had suffered heavy losses since March. reluctantly persisted until March. With the series of storms surrounding the vistle system, all the capital saw the "dawn" of the technology bubble burst. After a few weeks, the short sellers made a massive comeback, but unexpectedly, from the beginning of March 21st, a short period of three weeks, the short term book profits had disappeared and turned straight into losses. Cersei capital's cersei fund management company from the beginning of the year for the technology sector long position size has not been less than $5 billion. Since the beginning of March, with the reactivation of a large number of short positions, cersei fund management company has taken the opportunity to increase the total number of long positions to US $12 billion. With strong financial support and only three to five times of low leverage, the short-term decline of Cisco, AOL and other stocks did not make cersei fund management company burst. Now, it's just the strong rebound of technology stocks in recent days. Cersei fund management company's book loss of more than 600 million US dollars has been quickly wiped out, and further generated a lot of profits.
