Chapter 171: 171
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
Any film will welcome criticism, because no work can reach perfection, and because of persistent provocation and criticism, this is originally part of the work of film critics; what's more, thriller horror films are inherently more vulnerable to criticism. Hit, this is determined by the characteristics of the genre movie. Eight?? One Chinese W≈W＝W≤. ≤8≥1≥Z≤W≤. ≤COM "Buried alive" is no exception.
Among the many praises, Lisa-schazbaum of "Entertainment Weekly" unswervingly expressed her rejection and even dislike of the film, "The film is undoubtedly stupid, and Narcissistic. Whether the interpretation of the political perspective is monotonous, rigid, or stupid, and even has an impact on the visual effects of the movie itself and the pleasure of watching the movie. Hall's performance is the only highlight of the whole movie."
Lisa's point of view can be said to be brand new. The film's connection and criticism of reality, as the core idea, has been unanimously praised by most film critics. Everyone believes that this is a good supplement to the depth and thickness of the work; but On the contrary, Lisa believes that this has become a burden.
In the detailed film review of "Entertainment Weekly", Lisa verbally criticized this, and rightly believed that Rodriguez, as a Spaniard, not only lacked the understanding of American society, but also lacked sensitivity to political exhibitions. The blunt and superficial interpretation seriously affected the quality of the entire movie. Hidden behind this film review, you may be able to glimpse Lisa's political/government stance.
This is a myth that people have about the media. In the impression, the media always seems to maintain a neutral and objective position, respect facts, protect facts, and reveal facts. But in fact, every reporter, editor-in-chief, and columnist writer has his own cultural, religious, economic, and social background. When reporting the same thing, the perspective and viewpoint will inevitably be biased. This is inevitable. Yes, the use of words and sentences will be different; what's more, major media have their own political/government attributes. For example, in the United States, whether it is a Democratic or a Republican, Catholic, Christian or other denominations, this will affect the news reports of the media. Make an impact.
Just like in the US presidential election in 2016, even the "New York Times" and "Los Angeles Times" were biased in their reports during the reporting process, so that the elites believed in Hillary Clinton before the election results. (Hi1ary-net) was able to win, but voters in the central region punched the elite. The same is true of Brexit. London's elites are completely dumbfounded in the face of the results.
This is the most direct manifestation of the deviation of media reports.
Obviously, Lisa could not agree with the political/government views expressed by "Buried Alive", which also affected her perception of the whole movie.
However, Lisa is obviously not alone. There are two other film critics who hold similar views with her, and they have gone a step further, putting aside the political/political views, and criticizing and condemning the film itself. Peter Travis from the "Rolling Stones" spoke more intensely, and it could be said that the gunfire was full.
"If you are keen to be tortured-I'm not sure whether'enthusiasm' is the correct word-to be buried alive in a coffin for a hundred minutes, worse still, claustrophobia in a narrow space, There are cheap props that lack imagination, which completely ruined the film's innovative ability and the depth of the script. Such a mediocre and boring thriller work, then you are welcome to enter the cinema. In addition, the only thing that can help the audience get through What caused this disaster was not Hall’s handsome face, but Hall’s outstanding performance."
Although "Rolling Stone" is a music critic writer, it is still the most authoritative and most popular professional music magazine in North America. However, after entering the new century, it has begun to transform and gradually become a comprehensive magazine, thanks to its broad mass base. Their film reviews also have a large readership market.
Obviously, Pete's aversion to "buried alive" is all-encompassing, except for Lan Li. In this regard, the film critic James-Benard of the professional film magazine "Voice of the Village" also agreed.
"The weak script hardly has much room for flicking. We can only watch the actors get trapped in place, screaming, frightening, crying, and then repeating it again. It looks like an inferior trick of a schoolboy on Halloween. Hall did his best. Dedicated actor-level performances, but still can't save the whole movie from the bad. We have endured enough "Chainsaw Horror" and pray that "Buried Alive" will not be made into a series.
Compared with James’s harsh criticism, Lisa’s comments look like accusations of love. It can be clearly felt that James is not cold about the work "Buried Alive", and even Renly’s performance cannot save him. Of exclusion.
Among the nine reviews in the official journal, six were positive and three were negative. The debut of "buried alive" was the first shot, but what is even more commendable is that from the long applause after the end of the screening, to The tireless entanglement of reporters and audiences, and the recognition of the official site magazine, the film was suddenly pulled under the spotlight from the remote corner of the cold reception, and countless sights were projected over. At this time, people noticed this year. There is such a work at the Toronto Film Festival.
More importantly, Renly’s performance has received unanimous praise, no matter whether it is praise or criticism, even the comments of "Rolling Stone" and "Voice of the Village" are no exception, "Lanly-Hall" The name began to appear frequently in the newspapers.
Almost effortlessly, people’s memories are awakened-the newcomer who has just won the Emperor Shidi at the Emmy Awards, and the folk singer who has just made a splash on the tubing, deserves to be the hottest online discussion in the past month Artists, now, the previous craze has not completely calmed down, people are still amazed at the breakthrough of "Cleopatra" on the bulletin board, and now the Toronto Film Festival has ushered in good news. This is simply...wave after wave.
Who is Lan Li?
This question seems endless. After the Emmy Awards, a group of people asked questions, after "Ophelia", a group of people asked questions, and now a group of people asked questions during the Toronto Film Festival in full swing. With more and more focus on Lan Li, the mysterious halo became more and more prosperous, and the discussion boom swept once again.
The first to respond is undoubtedly the media colleagues.
The Toronto Film Festival is an international stage. Unlike the independent works shown on the North American art theaters, any work here will feel the attention from all over the world. Thousands of journalists from more than 400 media around the world are here. Docked. Any disturbance may attract the eyes of the "wolves".
Who has won the hearts of so many professional media? It has won the praises of the official journals. At present, it is only lagging behind the acclaimed "Blue Valentine's Day". It has become a dark horse since the opening of the film festival. One of the most discussed works, broken glasses shards scattered all over the floor?
Who on earth has made a **** road in a word of mouth, has received undifferentiated praise as an unknown newcomer, and every time a detail is revealed, surprises add one point: there are more than two months before the second At the age of eleven, the second work in his career as an actor, the first work on the big screen, a Spanish work invested by a mere three million yuan, defeated nearly a thousand competitors and won Steven Spielberg and Tom Hank Favor?
Who stole the glorious moment belonging to "Big Thieves in the City"? Who stole the glorious moment belonging to Ben Affleck? Under the magnificence of the screening last night, today’s media reports swept across the thousands. The army is almost predictable, but who would have thought that the front-page headlines of the major media are "The Thief in the City" and Ben Affleck, but the hot topic is Renly Hall?
Interestingly, the excitement of the European media is not inferior to that of North America. For North American media, they are excited that the Toronto Film Festival has another dark horse, and this is an English work, which means that it will be released in North America, and may even become the dark horse of the awards season-just like the "Hollywood Reporter" The forecast is average.
For the European media, what they are excited about is that the capital of the film comes from Spain, the director and filming team are all Spaniards, and the actor Renley is British. This is a European film of pure blood. So, who is Rodriguez Cortez? Who is Renly Hall?
Andy Rogers’ mobile phone has been completely blown up. Since "Buried Alive" is an independent work, the producer is Rodriguez Cortez, and the media can’t find a publicist at all, so they can only contact me; other than that In addition, it was the most watched Lanli. Their first reaction was to contact Lanli's agent.
In the next twenty-four hours ~www.novelhall.com~ Andy's mobile phone will almost never have a rest, and it will ring continuously. Interviews about "buried alive" and interviews about Lan Li are endless. .
Generally speaking, on a top stage such as the three major European film festivals, a movie may be promoted by 150 media outlets, and the entire interview process will last from four to five days, and there is still almost no rest. However, it is more difficult for independent films with a low degree of attention, most of which will be less than fifty-such a number is already a dream for independent films.
But now, at least 90 media outlets are making appointments for interviews with "Buried Alive" and Lanly, and this number is still rising. It can be clearly felt that with the word-of-mouth "buried alive" gradually fermented, media attention will rise sharply.
This is undoubtedly wonderful for Renly. The starting point for other actors is at most in the United States, and Renly’s first step is to make a blockbuster appearance on the international stage in Toronto. Such a shining debut, instantly attracted Attention from all over the world is a dream.
In comparison, the "Big Thief in the City" exploded on the night of the screening, and then it seemed to quiet down slowly, and the limelight was completely "buried alive", which really made Ben a heartbreak; it was even more depressing. Yes, the craze on the Internet, "Big Thieves in the City" has been firmly suppressed by "Buried Alive".
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
Any film will welcome criticism, because no work can reach perfection, and because of persistent provocation and criticism, this is originally part of the work of film critics; what's more, thriller horror films are inherently more vulnerable to criticism. Hit, this is determined by the characteristics of the genre movie. Eight?? One Chinese W≈W＝W≤. ≤8≥1≥Z≤W≤. ≤COM "Buried alive" is no exception.
Among the many praises, Lisa-schazbaum of "Entertainment Weekly" unswervingly expressed her rejection and even dislike of the film, "The film is undoubtedly stupid, and Narcissistic. Whether the interpretation of the political perspective is monotonous, rigid, or stupid, and even has an impact on the visual effects of the movie itself and the pleasure of watching the movie. Hall's performance is the only highlight of the whole movie."
Lisa's point of view can be said to be brand new. The film's connection and criticism of reality, as the core idea, has been unanimously praised by most film critics. Everyone believes that this is a good supplement to the depth and thickness of the work; but On the contrary, Lisa believes that this has become a burden.
In the detailed film review of "Entertainment Weekly", Lisa verbally criticized this, and rightly believed that Rodriguez, as a Spaniard, not only lacked the understanding of American society, but also lacked sensitivity to political exhibitions. The blunt and superficial interpretation seriously affected the quality of the entire movie. Hidden behind this film review, you may be able to glimpse Lisa's political/government stance.
This is a myth that people have about the media. In the impression, the media always seems to maintain a neutral and objective position, respect facts, protect facts, and reveal facts. But in fact, every reporter, editor-in-chief, and columnist writer has his own cultural, religious, economic, and social background. When reporting the same thing, the perspective and viewpoint will inevitably be biased. This is inevitable. Yes, the use of words and sentences will be different; what's more, major media have their own political/government attributes. For example, in the United States, whether it is a Democratic or a Republican, Catholic, Christian or other denominations, this will affect the news reports of the media. Make an impact.
Just like in the US presidential election in 2016, even the "New York Times" and "Los Angeles Times" were biased in their reports during the reporting process, so that the elites believed in Hillary Clinton before the election results. (Hi1ary-net) was able to win, but voters in the central region punched the elite. The same is true of Brexit. London's elites are completely dumbfounded in the face of the results.
This is the most direct manifestation of the deviation of media reports.
Obviously, Lisa could not agree with the political/government views expressed by "Buried Alive", which also affected her perception of the whole movie.
However, Lisa is obviously not alone. There are two other film critics who hold similar views with her, and they have gone a step further, putting aside the political/political views, and criticizing and condemning the film itself. Peter Travis from the "Rolling Stones" spoke more intensely, and it could be said that the gunfire was full.
"If you are keen to be tortured-I'm not sure whether'enthusiasm' is the correct word-to be buried alive in a coffin for a hundred minutes, worse still, claustrophobia in a narrow space, There are cheap props that lack imagination, which completely ruined the film's innovative ability and the depth of the script. Such a mediocre and boring thriller work, then you are welcome to enter the cinema. In addition, the only thing that can help the audience get through What caused this disaster was not Hall’s handsome face, but Hall’s outstanding performance."
Although "Rolling Stone" is a music critic writer, it is still the most authoritative and most popular professional music magazine in North America. However, after entering the new century, it has begun to transform and gradually become a comprehensive magazine, thanks to its broad mass base. Their film reviews also have a large readership market.
Obviously, Pete's aversion to "buried alive" is all-encompassing, except for Lan Li. In this regard, the film critic James-Benard of the professional film magazine "Voice of the Village" also agreed.
"The weak script hardly has much room for flicking. We can only watch the actors get trapped in place, screaming, frightening, crying, and then repeating it again. It looks like an inferior trick of a schoolboy on Halloween. Hall did his best. Dedicated actor-level performances, but still can't save the whole movie from the bad. We have endured enough "Chainsaw Horror" and pray that "Buried Alive" will not be made into a series.
Compared with James’s harsh criticism, Lisa’s comments look like accusations of love. It can be clearly felt that James is not cold about the work "Buried Alive", and even Renly’s performance cannot save him. Of exclusion.
Among the nine reviews in the official journal, six were positive and three were negative. The debut of "buried alive" was the first shot, but what is even more commendable is that from the long applause after the end of the screening, to The tireless entanglement of reporters and audiences, and the recognition of the official site magazine, the film was suddenly pulled under the spotlight from the remote corner of the cold reception, and countless sights were projected over. At this time, people noticed this year. There is such a work at the Toronto Film Festival.
More importantly, Renly’s performance has received unanimous praise, no matter whether it is praise or criticism, even the comments of "Rolling Stone" and "Voice of the Village" are no exception, "Lanly-Hall" The name began to appear frequently in the newspapers.
Almost effortlessly, people’s memories are awakened-the newcomer who has just won the Emperor Shidi at the Emmy Awards, and the folk singer who has just made a splash on the tubing, deserves to be the hottest online discussion in the past month Artists, now, the previous craze has not completely calmed down, people are still amazed at the breakthrough of "Cleopatra" on the bulletin board, and now the Toronto Film Festival has ushered in good news. This is simply...wave after wave.
Who is Lan Li?
This question seems endless. After the Emmy Awards, a group of people asked questions, after "Ophelia", a group of people asked questions, and now a group of people asked questions during the Toronto Film Festival in full swing. With more and more focus on Lan Li, the mysterious halo became more and more prosperous, and the discussion boom swept once again.
The first to respond is undoubtedly the media colleagues.
The Toronto Film Festival is an international stage. Unlike the independent works shown on the North American art theaters, any work here will feel the attention from all over the world. Thousands of journalists from more than 400 media around the world are here. Docked. Any disturbance may attract the eyes of the "wolves".
Who has won the hearts of so many professional media? It has won the praises of the official journals. At present, it is only lagging behind the acclaimed "Blue Valentine's Day". It has become a dark horse since the opening of the film festival. One of the most discussed works, broken glasses shards scattered all over the floor?
Who on earth has made a **** road in a word of mouth, has received undifferentiated praise as an unknown newcomer, and every time a detail is revealed, surprises add one point: there are more than two months before the second At the age of eleven, the second work in his career as an actor, the first work on the big screen, a Spanish work invested by a mere three million yuan, defeated nearly a thousand competitors and won Steven Spielberg and Tom Hank Favor?
Who stole the glorious moment belonging to "Big Thieves in the City"? Who stole the glorious moment belonging to Ben Affleck? Under the magnificence of the screening last night, today’s media reports swept across the thousands. The army is almost predictable, but who would have thought that the front-page headlines of the major media are "The Thief in the City" and Ben Affleck, but the hot topic is Renly Hall?
Interestingly, the excitement of the European media is not inferior to that of North America. For North American media, they are excited that the Toronto Film Festival has another dark horse, and this is an English work, which means that it will be released in North America, and may even become the dark horse of the awards season-just like the "Hollywood Reporter" The forecast is average.
For the European media, what they are excited about is that the capital of the film comes from Spain, the director and filming team are all Spaniards, and the actor Renley is British. This is a European film of pure blood. So, who is Rodriguez Cortez? Who is Renly Hall?
Andy Rogers’ mobile phone has been completely blown up. Since "Buried Alive" is an independent work, the producer is Rodriguez Cortez, and the media can’t find a publicist at all, so they can only contact me; other than that In addition, it was the most watched Lanli. Their first reaction was to contact Lanli's agent.
In the next twenty-four hours ~www.novelhall.com~ Andy's mobile phone will almost never have a rest, and it will ring continuously. Interviews about "buried alive" and interviews about Lan Li are endless. .
Generally speaking, on a top stage such as the three major European film festivals, a movie may be promoted by 150 media outlets, and the entire interview process will last from four to five days, and there is still almost no rest. However, it is more difficult for independent films with a low degree of attention, most of which will be less than fifty-such a number is already a dream for independent films.
But now, at least 90 media outlets are making appointments for interviews with "Buried Alive" and Lanly, and this number is still rising. It can be clearly felt that with the word-of-mouth "buried alive" gradually fermented, media attention will rise sharply.
This is undoubtedly wonderful for Renly. The starting point for other actors is at most in the United States, and Renly’s first step is to make a blockbuster appearance on the international stage in Toronto. Such a shining debut, instantly attracted Attention from all over the world is a dream.
In comparison, the "Big Thief in the City" exploded on the night of the screening, and then it seemed to quiet down slowly, and the limelight was completely "buried alive", which really made Ben a heartbreak; it was even more depressing. Yes, the craze on the Internet, "Big Thieves in the City" has been firmly suppressed by "Buried Alive".
Any film will welcome criticism, because no work can reach perfection, and because of persistent provocation and criticism, this is originally part of the work of film critics; what's more, thriller horror films are inherently more vulnerable to criticism. Hit, this is determined by the characteristics of the genre movie. Eight?? One Chinese WWW. 81ZW. COM "Buried alive" is no exception.Among the many praises, Lisa-schazbaum of "Entertainment Weekly" unswervingly expressed her rejection and even dislike of the film, "The film is undoubtedly stupid, and Narcissistic. Whether the interpretation of the political perspective is monotonous, rigid, or stupid, and even has an impact on the visual effects of the movie itself and the pleasure of watching the movie. Hall's performance is the only highlight of the whole movie."Lisa's point of view can be said to be brand new. The film's connection and criticism of reality, as the core idea, has been unanimously praised by most film critics. Everyone believes that this is a good supplement to the depth and thickness of the work; but On the contrary, Lisa believes that this has become a burden.In the detailed film review of "Entertainment Weekly", Lisa verbally criticized this, and rightly believed that Rodriguez, as a Spaniard, not only lacked the understanding of American society, but also lacked sensitivity to political exhibitions. The blunt and superficial interpretation seriously affected the quality of the entire movie. Hidden behind this film review, you may be able to glimpse Lisa's political/government stance.This is a myth that people have about the media. In the impression, the media always seems to maintain a neutral and objective position, respect facts, protect facts, and reveal facts. But in fact, every reporter, editor-in-chief, and columnist writer has his own cultural, religious, economic, and social background. When reporting the same thing, the perspective and viewpoint will inevitably be biased. This is inevitable. Yes, the use of words and sentences will be different; what's more, major media have their own political/government attributes. For example, in the United States, whether it is a Democratic or a Republican, Catholic, Christian or other denominations, this will affect the news reports of the media. Make an impact.Just like in the US presidential election in 2016, even the "New York Times" and "Los Angeles Times" were biased in their reports during the reporting process, so that the elites believed in Hillary Clinton before the election results. Hi1ary-net was able to win, but voters in the central region punched the elite. The same is true of Brexit. London's elites are completely dumbfounded in the face of the results.This is the most direct manifestation of the deviation of media reports.Obviously, Lisa could not agree with the political/government views expressed by "Buried Alive", which also affected her perception of the whole movie.However, Lisa is obviously not alone. There are two other film critics who hold similar views with her, and they have gone a step further, putting aside the political/political views, and criticizing and condemning the film itself. Peter Travis from the "Rolling Stones" spoke more intensely, and it could be said that the gunfire was full."If you are keen to be tortured-I'm not sure whether'enthusiasm' is the correct word-to be buried alive in a coffin for a hundred minutes, worse still, claustrophobia in a narrow space, There are cheap props that lack imagination, which completely ruined the film's innovative ability and the depth of the script. Such a mediocre and boring thriller work, then you are welcome to enter the cinema. In addition, the only thing that can help the audience get through What caused this disaster was not Hall's handsome face, but Hall's outstanding performance."Although "Rolling Stone" is a music critic writer, it is still the most authoritative and most popular professional music magazine in North America. However, after entering the new century, it has begun to transform and gradually become a comprehensive magazine, thanks to its broad mass base. Their film reviews also have a large readership market.Obviously, Pete's aversion to "buried alive" is all-encompassing, except for Lan Li. In this regard, the film critic James-Benard of the professional film magazine "Voice of the Village" also agreed."The weak script hardly has much room for flicking. We can only watch the actors get trapped in place, screaming, frightening, crying, and then repeating it again. It looks like an inferior trick of a schoolboy on Halloween. Hall did his best. Dedicated actor-level performances, but still can't save the whole movie from the bad. We have endured enough "Chainsaw Horror" and pray that "Buried Alive" will not be made into a series.Compared with James's harsh criticism, Lisa's comments look like accusations of love. It can be clearly felt that James is not cold about the work "Buried Alive", and even Renly's performance cannot save him. Of exclusion.Among the nine reviews in the official journal, six were positive and three were negative. The debut of "buried alive" was the first shot, but what is even more commendable is that from the long applause after the end of the screening, to The tireless entanglement of reporters and audiences, and the recognition of the official site magazine, the film was suddenly pulled under the spotlight from the remote corner of the cold reception, and countless sights were projected over. At this time, people noticed this year. There is such a work at the Toronto Film Festival.More importantly, Renly's performance has received unanimous praise, no matter whether it is praise or criticism, even the comments of "Rolling Stone" and "Voice of the Village" are no exception, "Lanly-Hall" The name began to appear frequently in the newspapers.Almost effortlessly, people's memories are awakened-the newcomer who has just won the Emperor Shidi at the Emmy Awards, and the folk singer who has just made a splash on the tubing, deserves to be the hottest online discussion in the past month Artists, now, the previous craze has not completely calmed down, people are still amazed at the breakthrough of "Cleopatra" on the bulletin board, and now the Toronto Film Festival has ushered in good news. This is simply...wave after wave.Who is Lan Li?This question seems endless. After the Emmy Awards, a group of people asked questions, after "Ophelia", a group of people asked questions, and now a group of people asked questions during the Toronto Film Festival in full swing. With more and more focus on Lan Li, the mysterious halo became more and more prosperous, and the discussion boom swept once again.The first to respond is undoubtedly the media colleagues.The Toronto Film Festival is an international stage. Unlike the independent works shown on the North American art theaters, any work here will feel the attention from all over the world. Thousands of journalists from more than 400 media around the world are here. Docked. Any disturbance may attract the eyes of the "wolves".Who has won the hearts of so many professional media? It has won the praises of the official journals. At present, it is only lagging behind the acclaimed "Blue Valentine's Day". It has become a dark horse since the opening of the film festival. One of the most discussed works, broken glasses shards scattered all over the floor?Who on earth has made a **** road in a word of mouth, has received undifferentiated praise as an unknown newcomer, and every time a detail is revealed, surprises add one point: there are more than two months before the second At the age of eleven, the second work in his career as an actor, the first work on the big screen, a Spanish work invested by a mere three million yuan, defeated nearly a thousand competitors and won Steven Spielberg and Tom Hank Favor?Who stole the glorious moment belonging to "Big Thieves in the City"? Who stole the glorious moment belonging to Ben Affleck? Under the magnificence of the screening last night, today's media reports swept across the thousands. The army is almost predictable, but who would have thought that the front-page headlines of the major media are "The Thief in the City" and Ben Affleck, but the hot topic is Renly Hall?Interestingly, the excitement of the European media is not inferior to that of North America. For North American media, they are excited that the Toronto Film Festival has another dark horse, and this is an English work, which means that it will be released in North America, and may even become the dark horse of the awards season-just like the "Hollywood Reporter" The forecast is average.For the European media, what they are excited about is that the capital of the film comes from Spain, the director and filming team are all Spaniards, and the actor Renley is British. This is a European film of pure blood. So, who is Rodriguez Cortez? Who is Renly Hall?Andy Rogers' mobile phone has been completely blown up. Since "Buried Alive" is an independent work, the producer is Rodriguez Cortez, and the media can't find a publicist at all, so they can only contact me; other than that In addition, it was the most watched Lanli. Their first reaction was to contact Lanli's agent.In the next twenty-four hours ~www.novelhall.com~ Andy's mobile phone will almost never have a rest, and it will ring continuously. Interviews about "buried alive" and interviews about Lan Li are endless. .Generally speaking, on a top stage such as the three major European film festivals, a movie may be promoted by 150 media outlets, and the entire interview process will last from four to five days, and there is still almost no rest. However, it is more difficult for independent films with a low degree of attention, most of which will be less than fifty-such a number is already a dream for independent films.But now, at least 90 media outlets are making appointments for interviews with "Buried Alive" and Lanly, and this number is still rising. It can be clearly felt that with the word-of-mouth "buried alive" gradually fermented, media attention will rise sharply.This is undoubtedly wonderful for Renly. The starting point for other actors is at most in the United States, and Renly's first step is to make a blockbuster appearance on the international stage in Toronto. Such a shining debut, instantly attracted Attention from all over the world is a dream.In comparison, the "Big Thief in the City" exploded on the night of the screening, and then it seemed to quiet down slowly, and the limelight was completely "buried alive", which really made Ben a heartbreak; it was even more depressing. Yes, the craze on the Internet, "Big Thieves in the City" has been firmly suppressed by "Buried Alive".
