Chapter 1929: 1929
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
The "Interstellar" media review was officially released.
Bad review, one.
In the middle review, ten.
...
Full score, ten.
Praise, twenty-eight.
...
Ignore the comment content for the time being, I can feel it simply from the data comparison. "Interstellar" continues the word-of-mouth trend during the internal trial screening. Under the overall pattern of ambiguity, ambiguous/ambiguity, praise for Nolan and Lanli It still has the upper hand-no matter what the personal view is, it is undeniable that the completion of the work is still worthy of recognition.
After carefully reviewing the content of the comments, one can gradually discover that the main controversy among film critics is whether the "subject of family affection" is enough: too dramatic? Too petty? Too sensational? Or is emotion an integral part of human nature? Is it right to return to humanity itself? Are the trigger points for discussion and reflection already visible everywhere?
This is also the boundary between middle reviews and good reviews.
Leaving aside the debate over the core theme, forty-eight of the forty-nine media have reached many consensuses:
The visual effects are really magnificent, the space images are really amazing, the sound effects are really wonderful, and the actors' performances are really good... Generally that is the case. Nolan once again showed his keen talent for camera, picture, editing and many other aspects. Successfully completed a well-made work.
The only regret and the most interesting point is that Nolan’s shortcomings that he is not good at tuning/teaching actors have been exposed again.
At the time, Heath Ledger of "Batman: The Dark Knight" relied entirely on the actor's own interpretation and interpretation. His role as a clown became the first actor in history to win an Oscar for his performance in a superhero movie. But Nolan's credit is really limited.
This is also true this time.
The core of the whole theme of "Interstellar Crossing" is based on emotions, which further highlights the importance of actor performance. Unfortunately, Nolan does not have the ability to tune/teach acting, and ultimately can only rely on the actor's self-play to complete the role. This is why he relies on strong casts.
Renly Hall, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, Michael Kane... This is a very strong cast. A total of 14 Oscar nominations and four Golden Man trophies have been won. The strength is undoubted, but the reputation of the performance is slightly different. Some people are full of praise, and some people are crazy about it. The main reason is-
Unable to unify.
Every actor has his own performance style, but Nolan has not been able to find the same rhythm and connect all the performances together. This also makes the final picture inevitably unbalanced, especially the difference in performance power and rhythm. It is often easy for the character's emotions to rise and fall like a seesaw, failing to form a unity, which further amplifies the drama of the emotions and leads to strong accusations of "soap operas".
The result is naturally that some people like to complain.
However, James Roche of "Playlist" is bound to disagree with the views of other film critics:
"Maybe "Interstellar Crossing" is not perfect, but Lanly-Hall once again proved that he is."
"This is definitely not Christopher Nolan's best work, and there is still a lot of level from the best; but undoubtedly, this is an exploration of Christopher Nolan out of his own security field, trying to broaden his understanding and exploration of the film, and The only reason for the success of this exploration is Lanly Hall!"
"Hall Hall Hall! Lanly-Hall once again proved that he is one of the best actors of our time! Every look on the big screen vividly interprets the emotional changes, and his performance endows the role. The true vitality is hard to imagine, what it would be like without Lanly-Hall’s Interstellar Transition."
"I really don't want to continue to praise Lanly-Hall. Those praises have made people ears callous, and even started to make people feel annoying. But the fact is that Hall once again proved that he is an actor under 30 years old. In, he is irreplaceable. The delicate and profound performance truly interprets the vastness of Othello."
"If in this world, choose an actor, sit in front of the camera and talk to himself, for a full ninety minutes, and the audience must sit in place and watch. My first choice will always be Lan Li -Hall! Has anyone noticed that Lanly-Hall stopped and turned around during the opening stage? That's the story."
"The favorite passage of the whole film: Lanly-Hall's eyes. In the most important turning points of the whole movie, Lanly-Hall's eyes have become the finishing touch on the entire big screen, simple and profound. It's full of power until I click. To be honest, I can't think of a better vocabulary to describe him."
"Being able to surpass the concealment of directors and special effects in a commercial film, and dedicating a profound performance that was sharp and sharp. The last time he appeared in Nolan's work, the actor was called Heath Ledger."
...
James Roche didn’t like Renly’s performance, not because Renly’s performance was disappointing, but because of the homogeneity of "interstellar crossing" and "gravity". He expected Renley to break through himself; but obviously , James Roche’s idea has not been recognized and supported by his colleagues.
Praise! Praise! Still praise! One after another, I couldn't stop, even the media that gave the middle review did not hesitate to praise their own words. Considering that this is a commercial movie, it is even more incredible. So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?
The haters are bound to think that this is another routine "commercial flattery". Perhaps Lan Li's performance is really good, but how can the focus of commercial movies be performance? It can be special effects, it can be a story, it can be a charm of the protagonist, but... performance? Isn't this a joke?
Supporters don’t care, because Lan Li has proven his excellence through performances time and time again. Prior to this, Lan Li’s performance was highly praised in "Speed and Excitement/Love 5" and "Edge of Tomorrow". , Then why not work in "Interstellar Crossing"? Maybe the performances of other actors in commercial films failed to show off, but it doesn't mean that Lanly is not good either. What's more, the case of "gravity" was not long ago.
This is a good thing and a bad thing.
However, it is undeniable that the media review has once again demonstrated the unmoved firmness of professional film critics-aside from the negative remarks during the award season, in fact, film critics have expressed their opinions on "gravity" and "drunken folk songs". The affirmative view has never changed. This is also a strong support point for Lan Li to win the Oscar nomination for the fourth consecutive year. Now, film critics still remain relatively objective and praise Lan Li.
After the trough of the awards season and the miss of the Oscar, people are still looking forward to the high-profile "burst drummer" at the Sundance Film Festival, looking forward to this work as a flash moment for Lan Li to show the charm of actors. ; But who would have thought that "Interstellar Crossing" took the lead in accomplishing such a feat in the summer file, showing Lan Li's strong control over the performance in the shell of a commercial movie, and won applause again!
The recovery momentum has come so fast!
But think about it seriously. Strictly speaking, Lan Li has never really fallen into a trough or in trouble, so there is no way to talk about "recovering".
The praise and pursuit of "Interstellar Crossing" is more about giving Lan Li the treatment he deserves again after a short period of ups and downs. This is a more appropriate way of saying-compared to the recovery and rise, Lan Li is now In terms of its position in the industry, the space for continuous "breakthrough" is really limited, and it is enough to return to its original position.
From the chaos of bad reviews and middle reviews to the heat wave of good reviews, the media review of "Interstellar Crossing" came on stage under the gaze of everyone's attention. The comprehensive reviews of forty-nine media finally settled on 79 points, unfortunately not. Being able to cross the eighty-point threshold and rank among the "excellent", this is also the lowest-rated work by the media since Lan Li's "detachment".
But is the seventy-nine score really too low? To be precise, it should be that Lan Li's works have too high a standard of praise, which can be seen by comparing Nolan's other works horizontally.
"Memories", eighty points.
"Fatal Magic", 66 points.
"Batman: The Mystery of the Shadows", seventy points.
"Batman: The Dark Knight", eighty-four points.
"Batman: The Dark Knight Rises", 78 points.
"Inception", seventy-four points.
In other words, the media review of "Interstellar Crossing" ranks third among Nolan's personal works, second only to "The Dark Knight" and "Shards of Memory", and easily surpasses "The Dark Knight Rises" and "Shards of Memory". "Inception", such scores are already very rare, and there is no doubt whether the film critics are good or bad.
In addition, you can also put "Interstellar Crossing" in this year's summer file to compete with the commercial film competitors released at the same time. Where can the 79-point media review be placed? It's clear.
"Captain America 2", seventy points.
"Rio Adventure 2", forty-nine points.
"Transcendent Hacker", forty-two points.
"The Amazing Spider-Man 2", 53 points.
"Godzilla~www.novelhall.com~62 points.
"X-Men: Reverse the Future", 75 points.
"Slumbering Curse", fifty-six points.
The summer archives have been unveiled for two full months. For large-scale projects with a production cost of more than 100 million yuan, only three works have passed the media review. "X-Men: Reversing the Future" is currently the king of word of mouth, "U.S. "Captain 2" followed closely, and "Godzilla" barely reached the landing level.
Now, "Interstellar Crossing" is on the stage. With a rating of 79 points, this work easily surpassed many competitors and became the work with the highest media review so far in the summer file. This also proves once again, "No. The partner combination of "Lanjia Lanli" is still the guarantee of the reputation of the work!
Earlier, Warner Bros. announced that the movie was filed, which caused countless speculations. Some people even believed that "Interstellar" was abandoned because of the poor quality of the finished product. It is likely to be the first Waterloo in Lan Li's career; But now, all the answers are revealed:
This is still one of the most watchable and most noteworthy works in the summer of 2014!
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
The "Interstellar" media review was officially released.
Bad review, one.
In the middle review, ten.
...
Full score, ten.
Praise, twenty-eight.
...
Ignore the comment content for the time being, I can feel it simply from the data comparison. "Interstellar" continues the word-of-mouth trend during the internal trial screening. Under the overall pattern of ambiguity, ambiguous/ambiguity, praise for Nolan and Lanli It still has the upper hand-no matter what the personal view is, it is undeniable that the completion of the work is still worthy of recognition.
After carefully reviewing the content of the comments, one can gradually discover that the main controversy among film critics is whether the "subject of family affection" is enough: too dramatic? Too petty? Too sensational? Or is emotion an integral part of human nature? Is it right to return to humanity itself? Are the trigger points for discussion and reflection already visible everywhere?
This is also the boundary between middle reviews and good reviews.
Leaving aside the debate over the core theme, forty-eight of the forty-nine media have reached many consensuses:
The visual effects are really magnificent, the space images are really amazing, the sound effects are really wonderful, and the actors' performances are really good... Generally that is the case. Nolan once again showed his keen talent for camera, picture, editing and many other aspects. Successfully completed a well-made work.
The only regret and the most interesting point is that Nolan’s shortcomings that he is not good at tuning/teaching actors have been exposed again.
At the time, Heath Ledger of "Batman: The Dark Knight" relied entirely on the actor's own interpretation and interpretation. His role as a clown became the first actor in history to win an Oscar for his performance in a superhero movie. But Nolan's credit is really limited.
This is also true this time.
The core of the whole theme of "Interstellar Crossing" is based on emotions, which further highlights the importance of actor performance. Unfortunately, Nolan does not have the ability to tune/teach acting, and ultimately can only rely on the actor's self-play to complete the role. This is why he relies on strong casts.
Renly Hall, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, Michael Kane... This is a very strong cast. A total of 14 Oscar nominations and four Golden Man trophies have been won. The strength is undoubted, but the reputation of the performance is slightly different. Some people are full of praise, and some people are crazy about it. The main reason is-
Unable to unify.
Every actor has his own performance style, but Nolan has not been able to find the same rhythm and connect all the performances together. This also makes the final picture inevitably unbalanced, especially the difference in performance power and rhythm. It is often easy for the character's emotions to rise and fall like a seesaw, failing to form a unity, which further amplifies the drama of the emotions and leads to strong accusations of "soap operas".
The result is naturally that some people like to complain.
However, James Roche of "Playlist" is bound to disagree with the views of other film critics:
"Maybe "Interstellar Crossing" is not perfect, but Lanly-Hall once again proved that he is."
"This is definitely not Christopher Nolan's best work, and there is still a lot of level from the best; but undoubtedly, this is an exploration of Christopher Nolan out of his own security field, trying to broaden his understanding and exploration of the film, and The only reason for the success of this exploration is Lanly Hall!"
"Hall Hall Hall! Lanly-Hall once again proved that he is one of the best actors of our time! Every look on the big screen vividly interprets the emotional changes, and his performance endows the role. The true vitality is hard to imagine, what it would be like without Lanly-Hall’s Interstellar Transition."
"I really don't want to continue to praise Lanly-Hall. Those praises have made people ears callous, and even started to make people feel annoying. But the fact is that Hall once again proved that he is an actor under 30 years old. In, he is irreplaceable. The delicate and profound performance truly interprets the vastness of Othello."
"If in this world, choose an actor, sit in front of the camera and talk to himself, for a full ninety minutes, and the audience must sit in place and watch. My first choice will always be Lan Li -Hall! Has anyone noticed that Lanly-Hall stopped and turned around during the opening stage? That's the story."
"The favorite passage of the whole film: Lanly-Hall's eyes. In the most important turning points of the whole movie, Lanly-Hall's eyes have become the finishing touch on the entire big screen, simple and profound. It's full of power until I click. To be honest, I can't think of a better vocabulary to describe him."
"Being able to surpass the concealment of directors and special effects in a commercial film, and dedicating a profound performance that was sharp and sharp. The last time he appeared in Nolan's work, the actor was called Heath Ledger."
...
James Roche didn’t like Renly’s performance, not because Renly’s performance was disappointing, but because of the homogeneity of "interstellar crossing" and "gravity". He expected Renley to break through himself; but obviously , James Roche’s idea has not been recognized and supported by his colleagues.
Praise! Praise! Still praise! One after another, I couldn't stop, even the media that gave the middle review did not hesitate to praise their own words. Considering that this is a commercial movie, it is even more incredible. So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?
The haters are bound to think that this is another routine "commercial flattery". Perhaps Lan Li's performance is really good, but how can the focus of commercial movies be performance? It can be special effects, it can be a story, it can be a charm of the protagonist, but... performance? Isn't this a joke?
Supporters don’t care, because Lan Li has proven his excellence through performances time and time again. Prior to this, Lan Li’s performance was highly praised in "Speed and Excitement/Love 5" and "Edge of Tomorrow". , Then why not work in "Interstellar Crossing"? Maybe the performances of other actors in commercial films failed to show off, but it doesn't mean that Lanly is not good either. What's more, the case of "gravity" was not long ago.
This is a good thing and a bad thing.
However, it is undeniable that the media review has once again demonstrated the unmoved firmness of professional film critics-aside from the negative remarks during the award season, in fact, film critics have expressed their opinions on "gravity" and "drunken folk songs". The affirmative view has never changed. This is also a strong support point for Lan Li to win the Oscar nomination for the fourth consecutive year. Now, film critics still remain relatively objective and praise Lan Li.
After the trough of the awards season and the miss of the Oscar, people are still looking forward to the high-profile "burst drummer" at the Sundance Film Festival, looking forward to this work as a flash moment for Lan Li to show the charm of actors. ; But who would have thought that "Interstellar Crossing" took the lead in accomplishing such a feat in the summer file, showing Lan Li's strong control over the performance in the shell of a commercial movie, and won applause again!
The recovery momentum has come so fast!
But think about it seriously. Strictly speaking, Lan Li has never really fallen into a trough or in trouble, so there is no way to talk about "recovering".
The praise and pursuit of "Interstellar Crossing" is more about giving Lan Li the treatment he deserves again after a short period of ups and downs. This is a more appropriate way of saying-compared to the recovery and rise, Lan Li is now In terms of its position in the industry, the space for continuous "breakthrough" is really limited, and it is enough to return to its original position.
From the chaos of bad reviews and middle reviews to the heat wave of good reviews, the media review of "Interstellar Crossing" came on stage under the gaze of everyone's attention. The comprehensive reviews of forty-nine media finally settled on 79 points, unfortunately not. Being able to cross the eighty-point threshold and rank among the "excellent", this is also the lowest-rated work by the media since Lan Li's "detachment".
But is the seventy-nine score really too low? To be precise, it should be that Lan Li's works have too high a standard of praise, which can be seen by comparing Nolan's other works horizontally.
"Memories", eighty points.
"Fatal Magic", 66 points.
"Batman: The Mystery of the Shadows", seventy points.
"Batman: The Dark Knight", eighty-four points.
"Batman: The Dark Knight Rises", 78 points.
"Inception", seventy-four points.
In other words, the media review of "Interstellar Crossing" ranks third among Nolan's personal works, second only to "The Dark Knight" and "Shards of Memory", and easily surpasses "The Dark Knight Rises" and "Shards of Memory". "Inception", such scores are already very rare, and there is no doubt whether the film critics are good or bad.
In addition, you can also put "Interstellar Crossing" in this year's summer file to compete with the commercial film competitors released at the same time. Where can the 79-point media review be placed? It's clear.
"Captain America 2", seventy points.
"Rio Adventure 2", forty-nine points.
"Transcendent Hacker", forty-two points.
"The Amazing Spider-Man 2", 53 points.
"Godzilla~www.novelhall.com~62 points.
"X-Men: Reverse the Future", 75 points.
"Slumbering Curse", fifty-six points.
The summer archives have been unveiled for two full months. For large-scale projects with a production cost of more than 100 million yuan, only three works have passed the media review. "X-Men: Reversing the Future" is currently the king of word of mouth, "U.S. "Captain 2" followed closely, and "Godzilla" barely reached the landing level.
Now, "Interstellar Crossing" is on the stage. With a rating of 79 points, this work easily surpassed many competitors and became the work with the highest media review so far in the summer file. This also proves once again, "No. The partner combination of "Lanjia Lanli" is still the guarantee of the reputation of the work!
Earlier, Warner Bros. announced that the movie was filed, which caused countless speculations. Some people even believed that "Interstellar" was abandoned because of the poor quality of the finished product. It is likely to be the first Waterloo in Lan Li's career; But now, all the answers are revealed:
This is still one of the most watchable and most noteworthy works in the summer of 2014!
The "Interstellar" media review was officially released.Bad review, one.In the middle review, ten....Full score, ten.Praise, twenty-eight....Ignore the comment content for the time being, I can feel it simply from the data comparison. "Interstellar" continues the word-of-mouth trend during the internal trial screening. Under the overall pattern of ambiguity, ambiguous/ambiguity, praise for Nolan and Lanli It still has the upper hand-no matter what the personal view is, it is undeniable that the completion of the work is still worthy of recognition.After carefully reviewing the content of the comments, one can gradually discover that the main controversy among film critics is whether the "subject of family affection" is enough: too dramatic? Too petty? Too sensational? Or is emotion an integral part of human nature? Is it right to return to humanity itself? Are the trigger points for discussion and reflection already visible everywhere?This is also the boundary between middle reviews and good reviews.Leaving aside the debate over the core theme, forty-eight of the forty-nine media have reached many consensuses:The visual effects are really magnificent, the space images are really amazing, the sound effects are really wonderful, and the actors' performances are really good... Generally that is the case. Nolan once again showed his keen talent for camera, picture, editing and many other aspects. Successfully completed a well-made work.The only regret and the most interesting point is that Nolan's shortcomings that he is not good at tuning/teaching actors have been exposed again.At the time, Heath Ledger of "Batman: The Dark Knight" relied entirely on the actor's own interpretation and interpretation. His role as a clown became the first actor in history to win an Oscar for his performance in a superhero movie. But Nolan's credit is really limited.This is also true this time.The core of the whole theme of "Interstellar Crossing" is based on emotions, which further highlights the importance of actor performance. Unfortunately, Nolan does not have the ability to tune/teach acting, and ultimately can only rely on the actor's self-play to complete the role. This is why he relies on strong casts.Renly Hall, Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, Michael Kane... This is a very strong cast. A total of 14 Oscar nominations and four Golden Man trophies have been won. The strength is undoubted, but the reputation of the performance is slightly different. Some people are full of praise, and some people are crazy about it. The main reason is-Unable to unify.Every actor has his own performance style, but Nolan has not been able to find the same rhythm and connect all the performances together. This also makes the final picture inevitably unbalanced, especially the difference in performance power and rhythm. It is often easy for the character's emotions to rise and fall like a seesaw, failing to form a unity, which further amplifies the drama of the emotions and leads to strong accusations of "soap operas".The result is naturally that some people like to complain.However, James Roche of "Playlist" is bound to disagree with the views of other film critics:"Maybe "Interstellar Crossing" is not perfect, but Lanly-Hall once again proved that he is.""This is definitely not Christopher Nolan's best work, and there is still a lot of level from the best; but undoubtedly, this is an exploration of Christopher Nolan out of his own security field, trying to broaden his understanding and exploration of the film, and The only reason for the success of this exploration is Lanly Hall!""Hall Hall Hall! Lanly-Hall once again proved that he is one of the best actors of our time! Every look on the big screen vividly interprets the emotional changes, and his performance endows the role. The true vitality is hard to imagine, what it would be like without Lanly-Hall's Interstellar Transition.""I really don't want to continue to praise Lanly-Hall. Those praises have made people ears callous, and even started to make people feel annoying. But the fact is that Hall once again proved that he is an actor under 30 years old. In, he is irreplaceable. The delicate and profound performance truly interprets the vastness of Othello.""If in this world, choose an actor, sit in front of the camera and talk to himself, for a full ninety minutes, and the audience must sit in place and watch. My first choice will always be Lan Li -Hall! Has anyone noticed that Lanly-Hall stopped and turned around during the opening stage? That's the story.""The favorite passage of the whole film: Lanly-Hall's eyes. In the most important turning points of the whole movie, Lanly-Hall's eyes have become the finishing touch on the entire big screen, simple and profound. It's full of power until I click. To be honest, I can't think of a better vocabulary to describe him.""Being able to surpass the concealment of directors and special effects in a commercial film, and dedicating a profound performance that was sharp and sharp. The last time he appeared in Nolan's work, the actor was called Heath Ledger."...James Roche didn't like Renly's performance, not because Renly's performance was disappointing, but because of the homogeneity of "interstellar crossing" and "gravity". He expected Renley to break through himself; but obviously , James Roche's idea has not been recognized and supported by his colleagues.Praise! Praise! Still praise! One after another, I couldn't stop, even the media that gave the middle review did not hesitate to praise their own words. Considering that this is a commercial movie, it is even more incredible. So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?The haters are bound to think that this is another routine "commercial flattery". Perhaps Lan Li's performance is really good, but how can the focus of commercial movies be performance? It can be special effects, it can be a story, it can be a charm of the protagonist, but... performance? Isn't this a joke?Supporters don't care, because Lan Li has proven his excellence through performances time and time again. Prior to this, Lan Li's performance was highly praised in "Speed and Excitement/Love 5" and "Edge of Tomorrow". , Then why not work in "Interstellar Crossing"? Maybe the performances of other actors in commercial films failed to show off, but it doesn't mean that Lanly is not good either. What's more, the case of "gravity" was not long ago.This is a good thing and a bad thing.However, it is undeniable that the media review has once again demonstrated the unmoved firmness of professional film critics-aside from the negative remarks during the award season, in fact, film critics have expressed their opinions on "gravity" and "drunken folk songs". The affirmative view has never changed. This is also a strong support point for Lan Li to win the Oscar nomination for the fourth consecutive year. Now, film critics still remain relatively objective and praise Lan Li.After the trough of the awards season and the miss of the Oscar, people are still looking forward to the high-profile "burst drummer" at the Sundance Film Festival, looking forward to this work as a flash moment for Lan Li to show the charm of actors. ; But who would have thought that "Interstellar Crossing" took the lead in accomplishing such a feat in the summer file, showing Lan Li's strong control over the performance in the shell of a commercial movie, and won applause again!The recovery momentum has come so fast!But think about it seriously. Strictly speaking, Lan Li has never really fallen into a trough or in trouble, so there is no way to talk about "recovering".The praise and pursuit of "Interstellar Crossing" is more about giving Lan Li the treatment he deserves again after a short period of ups and downs. This is a more appropriate way of saying-compared to the recovery and rise, Lan Li is now In terms of its position in the industry, the space for continuous "breakthrough" is really limited, and it is enough to return to its original position.From the chaos of bad reviews and middle reviews to the heat wave of good reviews, the media review of "Interstellar Crossing" came on stage under the gaze of everyone's attention. The comprehensive reviews of forty-nine media finally settled on 79 points, unfortunately not. Being able to cross the eighty-point threshold and rank among the "excellent", this is also the lowest-rated work by the media since Lan Li's "detachment".But is the seventy-nine score really too low? To be precise, it should be that Lan Li's works have too high a standard of praise, which can be seen by comparing Nolan's other works horizontally."Memories", eighty points."Fatal Magic", 66 points."Batman: The Mystery of the Shadows", seventy points."Batman: The Dark Knight", eighty-four points."Batman: The Dark Knight Rises", 78 points."Inception", seventy-four points.In other words, the media review of "Interstellar Crossing" ranks third among Nolan's personal works, second only to "The Dark Knight" and "Shards of Memory", and easily surpasses "The Dark Knight Rises" and "Shards of Memory". "Inception", such scores are already very rare, and there is no doubt whether the film critics are good or bad.In addition, you can also put "Interstellar Crossing" in this year's summer file to compete with the commercial film competitors released at the same time. Where can the 79-point media review be placed? It's clear."Captain America 2", seventy points."Rio Adventure 2", forty-nine points."Transcendent Hacker", forty-two points."The Amazing Spider-Man 2", 53 points."Godzilla~www.novelhall.com~62 points."X-Men: Reverse the Future", 75 points."Slumbering Curse", fifty-six points.The summer archives have been unveiled for two full months. For large-scale projects with a production cost of more than 100 million yuan, only three works have passed the media review. "X-Men: Reversing the Future" is currently the king of word of mouth, "U.S. "Captain 2" followed closely, and "Godzilla" barely reached the landing level.Now, "Interstellar Crossing" is on the stage. With a rating of 79 points, this work easily surpassed many competitors and became the work with the highest media review so far in the summer file. This also proves once again, "No. The partner combination of "Lanjia Lanli" is still the guarantee of the reputation of the work!Earlier, Warner Bros. announced that the movie was filed, which caused countless speculations. Some people even believed that "Interstellar" was abandoned because of the poor quality of the finished product. It is likely to be the first Waterloo in Lan Li's career; But now, all the answers are revealed:This is still one of the most watchable and most noteworthy works in the summer of 2014!
