Chapter 2239: 2239
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
Hollywood's major interest teams are panicking Lan Li sweeping the army? As a result, the insiders in the industry are attacking the rise and strength of Lanli, or are they trying to interfere with Lanli's career curve?
This really sounds like a fantasy: those behemoths with Wall Street capital, which is not the great giant across the world, how can they be messed up because of an independent individual? How could it be possible to change strategy because of an actor? Even in a fantasy novel, it is absolutely impossible to happen, more like a conspiracy theory conceived by a daydreaming out of the door, and it is ridiculous.
But calm down and think about it seriously: when Steve Jobs conceived the iPhone, no one expected that he could change the development process of the entire world; when Mark Zuckerberg was writing the Facebook program in the Harvard dorm, no one was there. It is expected that he can change the composition of life in the Internet age.
History makes heroes, and heroes often develop from "independent individuals."
Relying on Lan Li alone, he really can't shake the monsters of Wall Street Capital, but when Lan Li owns Sisyphus Pictures, this is another story.
The "New Yorker" article started with three far-reaching influences, expounding the "panic" from Hollywood:
The first is the related interests of superhero movies. Now DC and Marvel are thinking about whether they should cooperate with Lan Li, and Disney has taken the first step, successfully persuading Lan Li to join the Star Wars universe, plus Lan Li. Li joined the "Jurassic World" move, which also means that the profit model of commercial films may change.
Long before Renly, the huge influence of Johnny Depp and Robert Downey Jr. had given people a glimpse of the changes in the profit model of the movie. This is also the reason for the "fall of superstars"; and now, Renly is able to pry Move the profit model of the entire industry and become the "Last Hollywood Superstar". Then, when Lan Li and Mangai Films cooperate, the follow-up influence is far beyond imagination, and major film companies must face it.
The second is the production and distribution model of art films, starting with live lectures at the Sundance Film Festival, to the frequent actions of Sisyphus Pictures in the past few months, to independent films such as the Coen Brothers and Robert Redford. The big players in the field are ready to move, and finally the folk music festival begins to sprout. All this proves that the emergence of Lan Li is becoming a variable in the independent art industry, which is also brand new to Hollywood.
A digression, from Weinstein Pictures to Summit Entertainment to Lions Gate Pictures, including DreamWorks before it, although they all started as independent film companies, and then grew into giant crocodiles step by step, and began to change the rules of the industry, but In the final analysis, their business model has always been profit first-in line with market laws, which also means that they did not break out of the framework after all.
But now Sisyphus Pictures shows a different model, which is a bit similar to the three major European film festivals. Benefits are still the standard of consideration, but art occupies a larger proportion. This may also be a game-changing turning point. It is a severe challenge to industry regulations.
Of course, Sisyphus Pictures is not yet "successful" for the time being. How much shock this challenge can bring is unknown.
Finally, there is the change in the business model of Sisyphus Pictures, including the cooperation between Renly and the Berlin Film Festival, the Venice Film Festival, and the Sundance Film Festival, including Sisyphus Pictures’ acquisition of the crackle, including the two-pronged approach of film and television. , All of this reveals unusual, it seems that a storm is brewing.
The author of the article put forward a point at the conclusion stage: Although it is not yet possible to see the blueprint of Sisyphus Pictures, no one knows what they are planning. It seems that Lanli has been at the forefront of the times, and industry insiders cannot see through. His actions; but all the clues are revealing a wave of impending change, coupled with the "undefeated halo" of Lan Li so far, this also makes Sisyphus Pictures' actions more lethal. ——
Hollywood does not worry about a blue gift, but they must worry about a blue gift with capital.
If Sisyphus Pictures really rises, then the industry situation will definitely be broken, just like Steve Jobs’s Apple and Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook, they are both an unpredictable variable. This is also the fundamental reason why Hollywood has always been "fear of fear" Lan Li. In the final analysis, it is still worried about benefits.
This also returns to the goal of the whole article: Whose cheese did Lan Li move? This makes Lan Li always have to face the predicament of being attacked by the enemy in Hollywood.
Last year, the excellence of "Gravity" and "Drunk Country Folk Songs" was called the best of the decade. Even Matthew McConaughey's outstanding performance was eclipsed by Ren Li, but Ren Li is not only not the favorite of the award, but also The nomination stage almost fell behind, which simply fell through the glasses of all bystanders.
This year, "Interstellar" and "Burst Drummer" have joined forces. A commercial and an art. In the two works, Lan Li has dedicated amazing performances. Among them, the performance of "Blast Drummer" is even a top ten. One of the best alternate performances of the year is comparable to Daniel Day-Lewis's crazy performance in "The Blood Is Coming", but the momentum has only just picked up, and it hasn't even spread, and negative rumors have appeared.
So, whose cheese did Lan Li touch, so that he had to face embarrassment on all sides?
This article from the "New Yorker" is very clever and very cunning. It cleverly changed some concepts and shifted some goals, and interpreted the development trend of Hollywood in recent years from a different perspective—of course, it also concealed some key points. Information, but the context of the whole article is very clear, taking Lan Li as a foothold to examine the changes in the entire industry, and finally returning to Lan Li to discuss the current situation of Lan Li in Hollywood.
The whole article has clear thinking and sharp pen. It is not only persuasive, but also shocking and impactful. It connects all the focuses and hot spots in recent years and puts it under the background of the "burst drummer" spotlight boom. There has been an uproar on the social network:
You see, after the screening of "Burst Drummer", Lan Li's voice has just risen, and then there has been a wind-directed public opinion in the Hollywood industry and social networks. Isn't this the best proof against Lan Li? Almost every detail is echoing the "New Yorker" article.
It’s no wonder that every appearance of Lan Li is accompanied by negative news. No wonder Lan Li’s every move is placed under the microscope. No wonder Lan Li’s life is always surrounded by the spotlight... It seems that all the questions have finally been answered, so that netizens have finally found the answer. I have forgotten that, just a few days ago, the second "hype door" was about to move under their own supervision; now netizens easily blamed all their faults on...Wall Street.
Everyone hates Wall Street, don't they?
So, there are people who really want to snipe Renly? Isn't Renly worthy of the second Oscar statuette? Last year, the dual insurance of "Gravity" and "Drunk Country Folk Songs" were able to fall into a dilemma. Then, with the lack of competitiveness of "Interstellar Crossing" this year, it is very likely that "Burst Drummer" will be ignored again, isn't it?
Then, the question arises: If Lanly really becomes the public enemy of the whole people, is the "burst drummer" worthy of being the key to breaking the situation? To put it in a more popular way, is "Burst Drummer" worthy of the Oscar?
The netizens suddenly burst, and the entire social network began to discuss: Is Lan Li worth the second Oscar? Especially when the "Crazy Love" climbed to the top only three years ago, should the 25-year-old Lan Li defeat countless other outstanding actors and win two Oscars?
There are opponents, supporters, and wait-and-sees, but it is certain that all the conclusions after the argument are consistent:
Only if you have actually watched the movie with your own eyes can you prove it ~www.novelhall.com~ After all, without experience, you have no right to speak. Only when you enjoy the movie and make your own judgment can you support your point of view with actual evidence. So, all eyesight They focused on the "Burst Drummer", invisibly, the already extremely hot spot-view movie crowd once again climbed a step, and the "Blast Drummer" reproduced last year's "Drunk Country Folk Song". The pomp of hard-to-find tickets is even worse.
Even the Sony Classic was killed off guard.
Although the entire Hollywood clearly knows the powerful appeal of Lanly, every movie release will inevitably trigger a topic. As for how much the topic can be converted into the box office, that is another matter; but every time the actual situation can go out of the way. It is expected to break people's fixed cognition, and then create miracles again and again.
Not long ago, the box office of "Big Hero Hero 6" achieved brilliant results, but now, "Blasting Drummer" has unexpectedly become the focus of the nation in December. This is really incredible-Sony Classics There is no such plan at all, they are still planning to step by step to show them step by step, and the current situation makes them very surprised.
"Is there anything to stop Renly Hall?" This should be the most empathetic topic on the entire network.
For Harvey Weinstein, this was undoubtedly a slam dunk. It was hard to guide the trend of public opinion in the direction he expected. As a result, the article "The New Yorker" popped up without death, and it was cut off just right. Own actions-If it weren't for Harvey's confirmation that his abacus had not been exposed in advance, and there were no related rumors in the industry, he would almost think that the "New Yorker" was deliberately targeting himself.
Wait, is it Bob Weinstein targeting himself? Broken down inside the brothers?
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
Hollywood's major interest teams are panicking Lan Li sweeping the army? As a result, the insiders in the industry are attacking the rise and strength of Lanli, or are they trying to interfere with Lanli's career curve?
This really sounds like a fantasy: those behemoths with Wall Street capital, which is not the great giant across the world, how can they be messed up because of an independent individual? How could it be possible to change strategy because of an actor? Even in a fantasy novel, it is absolutely impossible to happen, more like a conspiracy theory conceived by a daydreaming out of the door, and it is ridiculous.
But calm down and think about it seriously: when Steve Jobs conceived the iPhone, no one expected that he could change the development process of the entire world; when Mark Zuckerberg was writing the Facebook program in the Harvard dorm, no one was there. It is expected that he can change the composition of life in the Internet age.
History makes heroes, and heroes often develop from "independent individuals."
Relying on Lan Li alone, he really can't shake the monsters of Wall Street Capital, but when Lan Li owns Sisyphus Pictures, this is another story.
The "New Yorker" article started with three far-reaching influences, expounding the "panic" from Hollywood:
The first is the related interests of superhero movies. Now DC and Marvel are thinking about whether they should cooperate with Lan Li, and Disney has taken the first step, successfully persuading Lan Li to join the Star Wars universe, plus Lan Li. Li joined the "Jurassic World" move, which also means that the profit model of commercial films may change.
Long before Renly, the huge influence of Johnny Depp and Robert Downey Jr. had given people a glimpse of the changes in the profit model of the movie. This is also the reason for the "fall of superstars"; and now, Renly is able to pry Move the profit model of the entire industry and become the "Last Hollywood Superstar". Then, when Lan Li and Mangai Films cooperate, the follow-up influence is far beyond imagination, and major film companies must face it.
The second is the production and distribution model of art films, starting with live lectures at the Sundance Film Festival, to the frequent actions of Sisyphus Pictures in the past few months, to independent films such as the Coen Brothers and Robert Redford. The big players in the field are ready to move, and finally the folk music festival begins to sprout. All this proves that the emergence of Lan Li is becoming a variable in the independent art industry, which is also brand new to Hollywood.
A digression, from Weinstein Pictures to Summit Entertainment to Lions Gate Pictures, including DreamWorks before it, although they all started as independent film companies, and then grew into giant crocodiles step by step, and began to change the rules of the industry, but In the final analysis, their business model has always been profit first-in line with market laws, which also means that they did not break out of the framework after all.
But now Sisyphus Pictures shows a different model, which is a bit similar to the three major European film festivals. Benefits are still the standard of consideration, but art occupies a larger proportion. This may also be a game-changing turning point. It is a severe challenge to industry regulations.
Of course, Sisyphus Pictures is not yet "successful" for the time being. How much shock this challenge can bring is unknown.
Finally, there is the change in the business model of Sisyphus Pictures, including the cooperation between Renly and the Berlin Film Festival, the Venice Film Festival, and the Sundance Film Festival, including Sisyphus Pictures’ acquisition of the crackle, including the two-pronged approach of film and television. , All of this reveals unusual, it seems that a storm is brewing.
The author of the article put forward a point at the conclusion stage: Although it is not yet possible to see the blueprint of Sisyphus Pictures, no one knows what they are planning. It seems that Lanli has been at the forefront of the times, and industry insiders cannot see through. His actions; but all the clues are revealing a wave of impending change, coupled with the "undefeated halo" of Lan Li so far, this also makes Sisyphus Pictures' actions more lethal. ——
Hollywood does not worry about a blue gift, but they must worry about a blue gift with capital.
If Sisyphus Pictures really rises, then the industry situation will definitely be broken, just like Steve Jobs’s Apple and Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook, they are both an unpredictable variable. This is also the fundamental reason why Hollywood has always been "fear of fear" Lan Li. In the final analysis, it is still worried about benefits.
This also returns to the goal of the whole article: Whose cheese did Lan Li move? This makes Lan Li always have to face the predicament of being attacked by the enemy in Hollywood.
Last year, the excellence of "Gravity" and "Drunk Country Folk Songs" was called the best of the decade. Even Matthew McConaughey's outstanding performance was eclipsed by Ren Li, but Ren Li is not only not the favorite of the award, but also The nomination stage almost fell behind, which simply fell through the glasses of all bystanders.
This year, "Interstellar" and "Burst Drummer" have joined forces. A commercial and an art. In the two works, Lan Li has dedicated amazing performances. Among them, the performance of "Blast Drummer" is even a top ten. One of the best alternate performances of the year is comparable to Daniel Day-Lewis's crazy performance in "The Blood Is Coming", but the momentum has only just picked up, and it hasn't even spread, and negative rumors have appeared.
So, whose cheese did Lan Li touch, so that he had to face embarrassment on all sides?
This article from the "New Yorker" is very clever and very cunning. It cleverly changed some concepts and shifted some goals, and interpreted the development trend of Hollywood in recent years from a different perspective—of course, it also concealed some key points. Information, but the context of the whole article is very clear, taking Lan Li as a foothold to examine the changes in the entire industry, and finally returning to Lan Li to discuss the current situation of Lan Li in Hollywood.
The whole article has clear thinking and sharp pen. It is not only persuasive, but also shocking and impactful. It connects all the focuses and hot spots in recent years and puts it under the background of the "burst drummer" spotlight boom. There has been an uproar on the social network:
You see, after the screening of "Burst Drummer", Lan Li's voice has just risen, and then there has been a wind-directed public opinion in the Hollywood industry and social networks. Isn't this the best proof against Lan Li? Almost every detail is echoing the "New Yorker" article.
It’s no wonder that every appearance of Lan Li is accompanied by negative news. No wonder Lan Li’s every move is placed under the microscope. No wonder Lan Li’s life is always surrounded by the spotlight... It seems that all the questions have finally been answered, so that netizens have finally found the answer. I have forgotten that, just a few days ago, the second "hype door" was about to move under their own supervision; now netizens easily blamed all their faults on...Wall Street.
Everyone hates Wall Street, don't they?
So, there are people who really want to snipe Renly? Isn't Renly worthy of the second Oscar statuette? Last year, the dual insurance of "Gravity" and "Drunk Country Folk Songs" were able to fall into a dilemma. Then, with the lack of competitiveness of "Interstellar Crossing" this year, it is very likely that "Burst Drummer" will be ignored again, isn't it?
Then, the question arises: If Lanly really becomes the public enemy of the whole people, is the "burst drummer" worthy of being the key to breaking the situation? To put it in a more popular way, is "Burst Drummer" worthy of the Oscar?
The netizens suddenly burst, and the entire social network began to discuss: Is Lan Li worth the second Oscar? Especially when the "Crazy Love" climbed to the top only three years ago, should the 25-year-old Lan Li defeat countless other outstanding actors and win two Oscars?
There are opponents, supporters, and wait-and-sees, but it is certain that all the conclusions after the argument are consistent:
Only if you have actually watched the movie with your own eyes can you prove it ~www.novelhall.com~ After all, without experience, you have no right to speak. Only when you enjoy the movie and make your own judgment can you support your point of view with actual evidence. So, all eyesight They focused on the "Burst Drummer", invisibly, the already extremely hot spot-view movie crowd once again climbed a step, and the "Blast Drummer" reproduced last year's "Drunk Country Folk Song". The pomp of hard-to-find tickets is even worse.
Even the Sony Classic was killed off guard.
Although the entire Hollywood clearly knows the powerful appeal of Lanly, every movie release will inevitably trigger a topic. As for how much the topic can be converted into the box office, that is another matter; but every time the actual situation can go out of the way. It is expected to break people's fixed cognition, and then create miracles again and again.
Not long ago, the box office of "Big Hero Hero 6" achieved brilliant results, but now, "Blasting Drummer" has unexpectedly become the focus of the nation in December. This is really incredible-Sony Classics There is no such plan at all, they are still planning to step by step to show them step by step, and the current situation makes them very surprised.
"Is there anything to stop Renly Hall?" This should be the most empathetic topic on the entire network.
For Harvey Weinstein, this was undoubtedly a slam dunk. It was hard to guide the trend of public opinion in the direction he expected. As a result, the article "The New Yorker" popped up without death, and it was cut off just right. Own actions-If it weren't for Harvey's confirmation that his abacus had not been exposed in advance, and there were no related rumors in the industry, he would almost think that the "New Yorker" was deliberately targeting himself.
Wait, is it Bob Weinstein targeting himself? Broken down inside the brothers?
Hollywood's major interest teams are panicking Lan Li sweeping the army? As a result, the insiders in the industry are attacking the rise and strength of Lanli, or are they trying to interfere with Lanli's career curve?This really sounds like a fantasy: those behemoths with Wall Street capital, which is not the great giant across the world, how can they be messed up because of an independent individual? How could it be possible to change strategy because of an actor? Even in a fantasy novel, it is absolutely impossible to happen, more like a conspiracy theory conceived by a daydreaming out of the door, and it is ridiculous.But calm down and think about it seriously: when Steve Jobs conceived the iPhone, no one expected that he could change the development process of the entire world; when Mark Zuckerberg was writing the Facebook program in the Harvard dorm, no one was there. It is expected that he can change the composition of life in the Internet age.History makes heroes, and heroes often develop from "independent individuals."Relying on Lan Li alone, he really can't shake the monsters of Wall Street Capital, but when Lan Li owns Sisyphus Pictures, this is another story.The "New Yorker" article started with three far-reaching influences, expounding the "panic" from Hollywood:The first is the related interests of superhero movies. Now DC and Marvel are thinking about whether they should cooperate with Lan Li, and Disney has taken the first step, successfully persuading Lan Li to join the Star Wars universe, plus Lan Li. Li joined the "Jurassic World" move, which also means that the profit model of commercial films may change.Long before Renly, the huge influence of Johnny Depp and Robert Downey Jr. had given people a glimpse of the changes in the profit model of the movie. This is also the reason for the "fall of superstars"; and now, Renly is able to pry Move the profit model of the entire industry and become the "Last Hollywood Superstar". Then, when Lan Li and Mangai Films cooperate, the follow-up influence is far beyond imagination, and major film companies must face it.The second is the production and distribution model of art films, starting with live lectures at the Sundance Film Festival, to the frequent actions of Sisyphus Pictures in the past few months, to independent films such as the Coen Brothers and Robert Redford. The big players in the field are ready to move, and finally the folk music festival begins to sprout. All this proves that the emergence of Lan Li is becoming a variable in the independent art industry, which is also brand new to Hollywood.A digression, from Weinstein Pictures to Summit Entertainment to Lions Gate Pictures, including DreamWorks before it, although they all started as independent film companies, and then grew into giant crocodiles step by step, and began to change the rules of the industry, but In the final analysis, their business model has always been profit first-in line with market laws, which also means that they did not break out of the framework after all.But now Sisyphus Pictures shows a different model, which is a bit similar to the three major European film festivals. Benefits are still the standard of consideration, but art occupies a larger proportion. This may also be a game-changing turning point. It is a severe challenge to industry regulations.Of course, Sisyphus Pictures is not yet "successful" for the time being. How much shock this challenge can bring is unknown.Finally, there is the change in the business model of Sisyphus Pictures, including the cooperation between Renly and the Berlin Film Festival, the Venice Film Festival, and the Sundance Film Festival, including Sisyphus Pictures' acquisition of the crackle, including the two-pronged approach of film and television. , All of this reveals unusual, it seems that a storm is brewing.The author of the article put forward a point at the conclusion stage: Although it is not yet possible to see the blueprint of Sisyphus Pictures, no one knows what they are planning. It seems that Lanli has been at the forefront of the times, and industry insiders cannot see through. His actions; but all the clues are revealing a wave of impending change, coupled with the "undefeated halo" of Lan Li so far, this also makes Sisyphus Pictures' actions more lethal. Hollywood does not worry about a blue gift, but they must worry about a blue gift with capital.If Sisyphus Pictures really rises, then the industry situation will definitely be broken, just like Steve Jobs's Apple and Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook, they are both an unpredictable variable. This is also the fundamental reason why Hollywood has always been "fear of fear" Lan Li. In the final analysis, it is still worried about benefits.This also returns to the goal of the whole article: Whose cheese did Lan Li move? This makes Lan Li always have to face the predicament of being attacked by the enemy in Hollywood.Last year, the excellence of "Gravity" and "Drunk Country Folk Songs" was called the best of the decade. Even Matthew McConaughey's outstanding performance was eclipsed by Ren Li, but Ren Li is not only not the favorite of the award, but also The nomination stage almost fell behind, which simply fell through the glasses of all bystanders.This year, "Interstellar" and "Burst Drummer" have joined forces. A commercial and an art. In the two works, Lan Li has dedicated amazing performances. Among them, the performance of "Blast Drummer" is even a top ten. One of the best alternate performances of the year is comparable to Daniel Day-Lewis's crazy performance in "The Blood Is Coming", but the momentum has only just picked up, and it hasn't even spread, and negative rumors have appeared.So, whose cheese did Lan Li touch, so that he had to face embarrassment on all sides?This article from the "New Yorker" is very clever and very cunning. It cleverly changed some concepts and shifted some goals, and interpreted the development trend of Hollywood in recent years from a different perspectiveof course, it also concealed some key points. Information, but the context of the whole article is very clear, taking Lan Li as a foothold to examine the changes in the entire industry, and finally returning to Lan Li to discuss the current situation of Lan Li in Hollywood.The whole article has clear thinking and sharp pen. It is not only persuasive, but also shocking and impactful. It connects all the focuses and hot spots in recent years and puts it under the background of the "burst drummer" spotlight boom. There has been an uproar on the social network:You see, after the screening of "Burst Drummer", Lan Li's voice has just risen, and then there has been a wind-directed public opinion in the Hollywood industry and social networks. Isn't this the best proof against Lan Li? Almost every detail is echoing the "New Yorker" article.It's no wonder that every appearance of Lan Li is accompanied by negative news. No wonder Lan Li's every move is placed under the microscope. No wonder Lan Li's life is always surrounded by the spotlight... It seems that all the questions have finally been answered, so that netizens have finally found the answer. I have forgotten that, just a few days ago, the second "hype door" was about to move under their own supervision; now netizens easily blamed all their faults on...Wall Street.Everyone hates Wall Street, don't they?So, there are people who really want to snipe Renly? Isn't Renly worthy of the second Oscar statuette? Last year, the dual insurance of "Gravity" and "Drunk Country Folk Songs" were able to fall into a dilemma. Then, with the lack of competitiveness of "Interstellar Crossing" this year, it is very likely that "Burst Drummer" will be ignored again, isn't it?Then, the question arises: If Lanly really becomes the public enemy of the whole people, is the "burst drummer" worthy of being the key to breaking the situation? To put it in a more popular way, is "Burst Drummer" worthy of the Oscar?The netizens suddenly burst, and the entire social network began to discuss: Is Lan Li worth the second Oscar? Especially when the "Crazy Love" climbed to the top only three years ago, should the 25-year-old Lan Li defeat countless other outstanding actors and win two Oscars?There are opponents, supporters, and wait-and-sees, but it is certain that all the conclusions after the argument are consistent:Only if you have actually watched the movie with your own eyes can you prove it ~www.novelhall.com~ After all, without experience, you have no right to speak. Only when you enjoy the movie and make your own judgment can you support your point of view with actual evidence. So, all eyesight They focused on the "Burst Drummer", invisibly, the already extremely hot spot-view movie crowd once again climbed a step, and the "Blast Drummer" reproduced last year's "Drunk Country Folk Song". The pomp of hard-to-find tickets is even worse.Even the Sony Classic was killed off guard.Although the entire Hollywood clearly knows the powerful appeal of Lanly, every movie release will inevitably trigger a topic. As for how much the topic can be converted into the box office, that is another matter; but every time the actual situation can go out of the way. It is expected to break people's fixed cognition, and then create miracles again and again.Not long ago, the box office of "Big Hero Hero 6" achieved brilliant results, but now, "Blasting Drummer" has unexpectedly become the focus of the nation in December. This is really incredible-Sony Classics There is no such plan at all, they are still planning to step by step to show them step by step, and the current situation makes them very surprised."Is there anything to stop Renly Hall?" This should be the most empathetic topic on the entire network.For Harvey Weinstein, this was undoubtedly a slam dunk. It was hard to guide the trend of public opinion in the direction he expected. As a result, the article "The New Yorker" popped up without death, and it was cut off just right. Own actions-If it weren't for Harvey's confirmation that his abacus had not been exposed in advance, and there were no related rumors in the industry, he would almost think that the "New Yorker" was deliberately targeting himself.Wait, is it Bob Weinstein targeting himself? Broken down inside the brothers?
