Chapter 2386: 2386
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
In addition to Italy’s “Daily Fact”, there are also two media outlets, “Time Magazine” in Germany and “Silver Screen” in the UK.
The German "Time", "The movie opened with a cool and strange opening to firmly capture the audience's attention. From the setting to the concept, it is very attractive. The cold mechanical performance is even more icing on the cake. But after entering the middle stage, Lost began to appear. The director seemed to be unable to determine 100% of his narrative focus. Not only did he lose the biggest core of black humor:'human beings turned into animals'; it also happened on the themes of love and family, relationships and class. The wavering deviation caused all the energy accumulated in the first half to disappear."
You can deeply feel the German media’s "hate iron is not steel" from the lines. Later, this magazine also wrote an in-depth film review to analyze the whole story frame to the main clues to the branch line layout, and then in-depth analysis of the plot. They expressed their deep regret for the "chaos" of the final product. They believed that "Ougs-Lance Moss has the opportunity to shoot a famous classic in history".
At the same time, the article also emphasized the outstanding performance of the entire cast, not just Blue Li, but Ben Wisshaw, Rachel Weisz, John C-Reilly and other actors all contributed wonderful performances. The seemingly dull but clever way of acting gives the characters more connotations worth exploring, which is why the article believes that "movies have countless possibilities".
"In the whole script—or in the whole movie, the only clear-cut and three-dimensional character is David Lanly Hall.
The transition of emotions and the step-by-step advancement of thoughts are complete and vivid, delicate and profound. Lanly-Hall gives the character infinite possibilities within a limited space; unfortunately, this is the only complete character, and the details of other characters The lack leaves the actors with no more room to play, and it also limits the film's further progress.
The final result is that David and other characters, David and the main line of the plot are also slightly separated, because the true core idea of the intertwining of the characters and the plot has not been clearly established, and the cohesive strength has shown a collapsed state. And then affect the audience's resonance. "
Later, this article entered the attention of the "Lobster" crew, and Lan Li even took the initiative to share the views of the article with Oggs, and the two sides exchanged opinions.
During the film promotion period, Oggs also publicly expressed his gratitude. Not only did he thank the reporters of the German "Times", and learned a lot from it; he also mentioned the discussion between him and Lan Li before the filming started, and obviously they were all aware of it. The problem is, and try to make adjustments.
"As they said, Lan Li’s role is undoubtedly the most complete and clearest, because Lan Li knows what he is doing and where he should go. This movie can reach its current height. Lan Li’s role It is far bigger than expected; unfortunately, we have not been able to spend enough time to polish all the other characters, and the core ideas of the second half of the plot have not been able to condense, and the final product does have room for improvement.
I think this is why we need to keep learning and growing. "
Oggs not only humbly accepted the opinions and completed the review; but also sincerely expounded the episode that was picky about Lan Li, making him truly aware of the irreplaceable importance of a good actor for the whole movie. Sex.
Such a gesture has won a lot of applause in North America and Europe. Not only did people not complain about "lobster" because of this, they also became more interested.
This also allows "Lobster" to win a good position during the awards season-of course, this is already a story.
Come back to the Cannes Film Festival.
The last media to give a two-star rating is the British "silver screen."
"Indeed,'Lobster' is a unique and deafening work. With a mirror-like shooting technique, it shows the current situation of our lives. It makes us begin to reflect on our marital relationship and social class, like a scalpel. The icy lines outline the framework of the entire era. Ougs-Lensmos’s mastery skills shown through the film initially showed the mastery, but the gap between him and Stanley Kubrick lies in the humanistic care. on-
The core of the movie's theme appears cold and alienated, and even a little proud of it, just like New York intellectuals mocking other poets to pretend to care about the world. This is arrogant and arrogant, and cannot resonate with the audience.
But we still cannot deny that Lance Moss did boldly challenge the sensitive nerves of some people; similarly, we cannot deny that the performance of Lanly Hall and Rachel Weisz has a keenness. The delicate touch gives the movie something more profound.
It’s just that we are not sure what “some content” is. "
The above are the ten media comments in the official Cannes magazine.
It is difficult to get too many clues from the scores of the journals alone. No one can predict the prospect of "Lobster" in Cannes this year. Judging from the current mainstream trend, the French media have generally expressed a positive attitude, which is exactly in line with the aesthetics of the Cohen brothers. The works of style are indeed very promising to win prizes.
But the direction of the wind is just the direction of the wind, and the media cannot accurately predict the preferences of the jury. This is nothing new in the three major European film festivals.
In the end, the official journal was released with two five-stars, four three-stars, three two-stars, and one one-star. In the final evaluation of a full score of four, "Lobster" got 2.7 points.
If you look closely, you can find that first, the reviews are relatively average; secondly, good reviews are greater than negative reviews, the number of five stars is higher than the number of one star, and the number of three stars is also higher than the number of two stars. In other words, on the whole, the "lobster" comments are still moving towards a positive trend amidst controversy and heated discussions.
The average score of 2.7 points is the most direct manifestation.
For the Cannes Film Festival, works with more than three points can be called "classic masterpieces", such as the "Drunk Country Folk Songs" two years ago; but in history, works that can win more than three points at the Cannes Film Festival There are only more than twenty, and the number is very scarce.
At 2:7, this is already a very good evaluation. So, where is the position of "Lobster" in the main competition unit-the official journal can be seen at a glance.
Today is the sixth day of the Cannes Film Festival. The annual event has just passed halfway. The main competition, the director’s fortnight, and one kind of attention are all screened steadily. Among them, the most watched main competition has been screened. Eight works, all scores are publicly presented:
"Haijie Diary", 2.5.
"Story of Stories", 2.0.
"Son of Thor", 2.8.
"My Mother", 2.7.
"Aokigahara Sea of Trees", 0.6.
"My King", 1.4.
"Market Law", 2.3.
"Lobster", 2.7.
No analysis is required at all, and the overall pattern of the main competition unit is very clear.
Gus Van Sant’s "Aokigahara Sea of Trees" landed in Cannes under the expectation, but encountered an unprecedented full-scale attack on the street. This work starring Matthew McConaughey faced a condemnation of verbal criticism. Created the lowest score in Cannes since the 21st century, which is extremely tragic.
Hungarian director Laszlo-Nemes’s feature film "Son of Sol" was rejected by the main competition unit of the Berlin Film Festival at the beginning of the year. Although it was able to be screened in the non-competitive unit, the main creative team decided to abandon Berlin. Came to Cannes, and finally ushered in a huge success, currently leading the highest score in the field with 2.8 points, and also won a full house at the premiere scene, the Coen brothers and Sienna Miller were tearful.
Then... the new work "My Mother" by the Italian director Nanni-Moretti and the "Lobster" by Ougs Lansmos also temporarily tied for second place in the show with two points and seven points, better than Japan. The director is Hirokazu Edema's topical work, "The Diary of the Sea Street", and the evaluation is even better.
So, what does this mean?
The answer is: it doesn't mean anything.
The journal is the journal, and the scoring is the scoring, while the award is another matter. The aesthetics of media reporters cannot represent the opinions and views of the jury.
But one thing is certain: "Lobster" is far from rushing to the street, and even not as harsh and harsh as the verbal criticism that "detachment" faced at the beginning; after "anti-cancer me", Lan Li, who once again challenged comedy performance, was unexpectedly refreshed. The public impression once again brought a novel performance.
It can be said with certainty that the blue gift of the second Oscar statuette has been won not long ago, and he still maintains his consistently high level.
This is enough.
What's more, even if it is on the street, Lanly can still detonate the reporter's discussion boom; therefore, this has no effect on the reporter.
"So, how do you feel?" Waiting for Lanly to finish reading the newsletter, Bradley threw an introduction.
Lan Li pursed the corner of his mouth, "I really want to see the two works of "Sor's Son" and "Aokihara Shuhai". UU Reading www.uukanshu.com" one has the highest score and the other has the lowest score.
Bradley couldn't help laughing.
Gavin asked curiously, "Why? Is it just because of good and bad reviews?"
"Part of the reason. I have to admit, what kind of work Gus filmed in order to get the media to score such a low score." Lan Li glanced at the newsletter again: six and one star, four media outlets refused to comment. This is true. "If I remember correctly, when the "Elephant" premiered in Cannes, because the controversy was so great, there were even reporters fighting at the media conference. I guess whether this work is also the case. Is that so?"
In the last life, Lan Li never watched the work "Aokigahara Shuhai" because he felt it was unnecessary, but now his perspective and thinking have changed, and he does have some curiosity.
"Previously, Christopher Nolan personally confirmed that the number one choice for Interstellar Crossing was Matthew McConaughey, but in the end he chose you to play. After missing this work, Matthew's works in the past two years seem to be all It has not been able to meet expectations and is generally considered to be the curse of the little golden man. This time the "Aokigahara Shukai" is facing such an encounter. What do you think?"
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
In addition to Italy’s “Daily Fact”, there are also two media outlets, “Time Magazine” in Germany and “Silver Screen” in the UK.
The German "Time", "The movie opened with a cool and strange opening to firmly capture the audience's attention. From the setting to the concept, it is very attractive. The cold mechanical performance is even more icing on the cake. But after entering the middle stage, Lost began to appear. The director seemed to be unable to determine 100% of his narrative focus. Not only did he lose the biggest core of black humor:'human beings turned into animals'; it also happened on the themes of love and family, relationships and class. The wavering deviation caused all the energy accumulated in the first half to disappear."
You can deeply feel the German media’s "hate iron is not steel" from the lines. Later, this magazine also wrote an in-depth film review to analyze the whole story frame to the main clues to the branch line layout, and then in-depth analysis of the plot. They expressed their deep regret for the "chaos" of the final product. They believed that "Ougs-Lance Moss has the opportunity to shoot a famous classic in history".
At the same time, the article also emphasized the outstanding performance of the entire cast, not just Blue Li, but Ben Wisshaw, Rachel Weisz, John C-Reilly and other actors all contributed wonderful performances. The seemingly dull but clever way of acting gives the characters more connotations worth exploring, which is why the article believes that "movies have countless possibilities".
"In the whole script—or in the whole movie, the only clear-cut and three-dimensional character is David Lanly Hall.
The transition of emotions and the step-by-step advancement of thoughts are complete and vivid, delicate and profound. Lanly-Hall gives the character infinite possibilities within a limited space; unfortunately, this is the only complete character, and the details of other characters The lack leaves the actors with no more room to play, and it also limits the film's further progress.
The final result is that David and other characters, David and the main line of the plot are also slightly separated, because the true core idea of the intertwining of the characters and the plot has not been clearly established, and the cohesive strength has shown a collapsed state. And then affect the audience's resonance. "
Later, this article entered the attention of the "Lobster" crew, and Lan Li even took the initiative to share the views of the article with Oggs, and the two sides exchanged opinions.
During the film promotion period, Oggs also publicly expressed his gratitude. Not only did he thank the reporters of the German "Times", and learned a lot from it; he also mentioned the discussion between him and Lan Li before the filming started, and obviously they were all aware of it. The problem is, and try to make adjustments.
"As they said, Lan Li’s role is undoubtedly the most complete and clearest, because Lan Li knows what he is doing and where he should go. This movie can reach its current height. Lan Li’s role It is far bigger than expected; unfortunately, we have not been able to spend enough time to polish all the other characters, and the core ideas of the second half of the plot have not been able to condense, and the final product does have room for improvement.
I think this is why we need to keep learning and growing. "
Oggs not only humbly accepted the opinions and completed the review; but also sincerely expounded the episode that was picky about Lan Li, making him truly aware of the irreplaceable importance of a good actor for the whole movie. Sex.
Such a gesture has won a lot of applause in North America and Europe. Not only did people not complain about "lobster" because of this, they also became more interested.
This also allows "Lobster" to win a good position during the awards season-of course, this is already a story.
Come back to the Cannes Film Festival.
The last media to give a two-star rating is the British "silver screen."
"Indeed,'Lobster' is a unique and deafening work. With a mirror-like shooting technique, it shows the current situation of our lives. It makes us begin to reflect on our marital relationship and social class, like a scalpel. The icy lines outline the framework of the entire era. Ougs-Lensmos’s mastery skills shown through the film initially showed the mastery, but the gap between him and Stanley Kubrick lies in the humanistic care. on-
The core of the movie's theme appears cold and alienated, and even a little proud of it, just like New York intellectuals mocking other poets to pretend to care about the world. This is arrogant and arrogant, and cannot resonate with the audience.
But we still cannot deny that Lance Moss did boldly challenge the sensitive nerves of some people; similarly, we cannot deny that the performance of Lanly Hall and Rachel Weisz has a keenness. The delicate touch gives the movie something more profound.
It’s just that we are not sure what “some content” is. "
The above are the ten media comments in the official Cannes magazine.
It is difficult to get too many clues from the scores of the journals alone. No one can predict the prospect of "Lobster" in Cannes this year. Judging from the current mainstream trend, the French media have generally expressed a positive attitude, which is exactly in line with the aesthetics of the Cohen brothers. The works of style are indeed very promising to win prizes.
But the direction of the wind is just the direction of the wind, and the media cannot accurately predict the preferences of the jury. This is nothing new in the three major European film festivals.
In the end, the official journal was released with two five-stars, four three-stars, three two-stars, and one one-star. In the final evaluation of a full score of four, "Lobster" got 2.7 points.
If you look closely, you can find that first, the reviews are relatively average; secondly, good reviews are greater than negative reviews, the number of five stars is higher than the number of one star, and the number of three stars is also higher than the number of two stars. In other words, on the whole, the "lobster" comments are still moving towards a positive trend amidst controversy and heated discussions.
The average score of 2.7 points is the most direct manifestation.
For the Cannes Film Festival, works with more than three points can be called "classic masterpieces", such as the "Drunk Country Folk Songs" two years ago; but in history, works that can win more than three points at the Cannes Film Festival There are only more than twenty, and the number is very scarce.
At 2:7, this is already a very good evaluation. So, where is the position of "Lobster" in the main competition unit-the official journal can be seen at a glance.
Today is the sixth day of the Cannes Film Festival. The annual event has just passed halfway. The main competition, the director’s fortnight, and one kind of attention are all screened steadily. Among them, the most watched main competition has been screened. Eight works, all scores are publicly presented:
"Haijie Diary", 2.5.
"Story of Stories", 2.0.
"Son of Thor", 2.8.
"My Mother", 2.7.
"Aokigahara Sea of Trees", 0.6.
"My King", 1.4.
"Market Law", 2.3.
"Lobster", 2.7.
No analysis is required at all, and the overall pattern of the main competition unit is very clear.
Gus Van Sant’s "Aokigahara Sea of Trees" landed in Cannes under the expectation, but encountered an unprecedented full-scale attack on the street. This work starring Matthew McConaughey faced a condemnation of verbal criticism. Created the lowest score in Cannes since the 21st century, which is extremely tragic.
Hungarian director Laszlo-Nemes’s feature film "Son of Sol" was rejected by the main competition unit of the Berlin Film Festival at the beginning of the year. Although it was able to be screened in the non-competitive unit, the main creative team decided to abandon Berlin. Came to Cannes, and finally ushered in a huge success, currently leading the highest score in the field with 2.8 points, and also won a full house at the premiere scene, the Coen brothers and Sienna Miller were tearful.
Then... the new work "My Mother" by the Italian director Nanni-Moretti and the "Lobster" by Ougs Lansmos also temporarily tied for second place in the show with two points and seven points, better than Japan. The director is Hirokazu Edema's topical work, "The Diary of the Sea Street", and the evaluation is even better.
So, what does this mean?
The answer is: it doesn't mean anything.
The journal is the journal, and the scoring is the scoring, while the award is another matter. The aesthetics of media reporters cannot represent the opinions and views of the jury.
But one thing is certain: "Lobster" is far from rushing to the street, and even not as harsh and harsh as the verbal criticism that "detachment" faced at the beginning; after "anti-cancer me", Lan Li, who once again challenged comedy performance, was unexpectedly refreshed. The public impression once again brought a novel performance.
It can be said with certainty that the blue gift of the second Oscar statuette has been won not long ago, and he still maintains his consistently high level.
This is enough.
What's more, even if it is on the street, Lanly can still detonate the reporter's discussion boom; therefore, this has no effect on the reporter.
"So, how do you feel?" Waiting for Lanly to finish reading the newsletter, Bradley threw an introduction.
Lan Li pursed the corner of his mouth, "I really want to see the two works of "Sor's Son" and "Aokihara Shuhai". UU Reading www.uukanshu.com" one has the highest score and the other has the lowest score.
Bradley couldn't help laughing.
Gavin asked curiously, "Why? Is it just because of good and bad reviews?"
"Part of the reason. I have to admit, what kind of work Gus filmed in order to get the media to score such a low score." Lan Li glanced at the newsletter again: six and one star, four media outlets refused to comment. This is true. "If I remember correctly, when the "Elephant" premiered in Cannes, because the controversy was so great, there were even reporters fighting at the media conference. I guess whether this work is also the case. Is that so?"
In the last life, Lan Li never watched the work "Aokigahara Shuhai" because he felt it was unnecessary, but now his perspective and thinking have changed, and he does have some curiosity.
"Previously, Christopher Nolan personally confirmed that the number one choice for Interstellar Crossing was Matthew McConaughey, but in the end he chose you to play. After missing this work, Matthew's works in the past two years seem to be all It has not been able to meet expectations and is generally considered to be the curse of the little golden man. This time the "Aokigahara Shukai" is facing such an encounter. What do you think?"
In addition to Italy's Daily Fact, there are also two media outlets, Time Magazine in Germany and Silver Screen in the UK.The German "Time", "The movie opened with a cool and strange opening to firmly capture the audience's attention. From the setting to the concept, it is very attractive. The cold mechanical performance is even more icing on the cake. But after entering the middle stage, Lost began to appear. The director seemed to be unable to determine 100% of his narrative focus. Not only did he lose the biggest core of black humor:'human beings turned into animals'; it also happened on the themes of love and family, relationships and class. The wavering deviation caused all the energy accumulated in the first half to disappear."You can deeply feel the German media's "hate iron is not steel" from the lines. Later, this magazine also wrote an in-depth film review to analyze the whole story frame to the main clues to the branch line layout, and then in-depth analysis of the plot. They expressed their deep regret for the "chaos" of the final product. They believed that "Ougs-Lance Moss has the opportunity to shoot a famous classic in history".At the same time, the article also emphasized the outstanding performance of the entire cast, not just Blue Li, but Ben Wisshaw, Rachel Weisz, John C-Reilly and other actors all contributed wonderful performances. The seemingly dull but clever way of acting gives the characters more connotations worth exploring, which is why the article believes that "movies have countless possibilities"."In the whole scriptor in the whole movie, the only clear-cut and three-dimensional character is David Lanly Hall.The transition of emotions and the step-by-step advancement of thoughts are complete and vivid, delicate and profound. Lanly-Hall gives the character infinite possibilities within a limited space; unfortunately, this is the only complete character, and the details of other characters The lack leaves the actors with no more room to play, and it also limits the film's further progress.The final result is that David and other characters, David and the main line of the plot are also slightly separated, because the true core idea of the intertwining of the characters and the plot has not been clearly established, and the cohesive strength has shown a collapsed state. And then affect the audience's resonance. "Later, this article entered the attention of the "Lobster" crew, and Lan Li even took the initiative to share the views of the article with Oggs, and the two sides exchanged opinions.During the film promotion period, Oggs also publicly expressed his gratitude. Not only did he thank the reporters of the German "Times", and learned a lot from it; he also mentioned the discussion between him and Lan Li before the filming started, and obviously they were all aware of it. The problem is, and try to make adjustments."As they said, Lan Li's role is undoubtedly the most complete and clearest, because Lan Li knows what he is doing and where he should go. This movie can reach its current height. Lan Li's role It is far bigger than expected; unfortunately, we have not been able to spend enough time to polish all the other characters, and the core ideas of the second half of the plot have not been able to condense, and the final product does have room for improvement.I think this is why we need to keep learning and growing. "Oggs not only humbly accepted the opinions and completed the review; but also sincerely expounded the episode that was picky about Lan Li, making him truly aware of the irreplaceable importance of a good actor for the whole movie. Sex.Such a gesture has won a lot of applause in North America and Europe. Not only did people not complain about "lobster" because of this, they also became more interested.This also allows "Lobster" to win a good position during the awards season-of course, this is already a story.Come back to the Cannes Film Festival.The last media to give a two-star rating is the British "silver screen.""Indeed,'Lobster' is a unique and deafening work. With a mirror-like shooting technique, it shows the current situation of our lives. It makes us begin to reflect on our marital relationship and social class, like a scalpel. The icy lines outline the framework of the entire era. Ougs-Lensmos's mastery skills shown through the film initially showed the mastery, but the gap between him and Stanley Kubrick lies in the humanistic care. on-The core of the movie's theme appears cold and alienated, and even a little proud of it, just like New York intellectuals mocking other poets to pretend to care about the world. This is arrogant and arrogant, and cannot resonate with the audience.But we still cannot deny that Lance Moss did boldly challenge the sensitive nerves of some people; similarly, we cannot deny that the performance of Lanly Hall and Rachel Weisz has a keenness. The delicate touch gives the movie something more profound.It's just that we are not sure what some content is. "The above are the ten media comments in the official Cannes magazine.It is difficult to get too many clues from the scores of the journals alone. No one can predict the prospect of "Lobster" in Cannes this year. Judging from the current mainstream trend, the French media have generally expressed a positive attitude, which is exactly in line with the aesthetics of the Cohen brothers. The works of style are indeed very promising to win prizes.But the direction of the wind is just the direction of the wind, and the media cannot accurately predict the preferences of the jury. This is nothing new in the three major European film festivals.In the end, the official journal was released with two five-stars, four three-stars, three two-stars, and one one-star. In the final evaluation of a full score of four, "Lobster" got 2.7 points.If you look closely, you can find that first, the reviews are relatively average; secondly, good reviews are greater than negative reviews, the number of five stars is higher than the number of one star, and the number of three stars is also higher than the number of two stars. In other words, on the whole, the "lobster" comments are still moving towards a positive trend amidst controversy and heated discussions.The average score of 2.7 points is the most direct manifestation.For the Cannes Film Festival, works with more than three points can be called "classic masterpieces", such as the "Drunk Country Folk Songs" two years ago; but in history, works that can win more than three points at the Cannes Film Festival There are only more than twenty, and the number is very scarce.At 2:7, this is already a very good evaluation. So, where is the position of "Lobster" in the main competition unit-the official journal can be seen at a glance.Today is the sixth day of the Cannes Film Festival. The annual event has just passed halfway. The main competition, the director's fortnight, and one kind of attention are all screened steadily. Among them, the most watched main competition has been screened. Eight works, all scores are publicly presented:"Haijie Diary", 2.5."Story of Stories", 2.0."Son of Thor", 2.8."My Mother", 2.7."Aokigahara Sea of Trees", 0.6."My King", 1.4."Market Law", 2.3."Lobster", 2.7.No analysis is required at all, and the overall pattern of the main competition unit is very clear.Gus Van Sant's "Aokigahara Sea of Trees" landed in Cannes under the expectation, but encountered an unprecedented full-scale attack on the street. This work starring Matthew McConaughey faced a condemnation of verbal criticism. Created the lowest score in Cannes since the 21st century, which is extremely tragic.Hungarian director Laszlo-Nemes's feature film "Son of Sol" was rejected by the main competition unit of the Berlin Film Festival at the beginning of the year. Although it was able to be screened in the non-competitive unit, the main creative team decided to abandon Berlin. Came to Cannes, and finally ushered in a huge success, currently leading the highest score in the field with 2.8 points, and also won a full house at the premiere scene, the Coen brothers and Sienna Miller were tearful.Then... the new work "My Mother" by the Italian director Nanni-Moretti and the "Lobster" by Ougs Lansmos also temporarily tied for second place in the show with two points and seven points, better than Japan. The director is Hirokazu Edema's topical work, "The Diary of the Sea Street", and the evaluation is even better.So, what does this mean?The answer is: it doesn't mean anything.The journal is the journal, and the scoring is the scoring, while the award is another matter. The aesthetics of media reporters cannot represent the opinions and views of the jury.But one thing is certain: "Lobster" is far from rushing to the street, and even not as harsh and harsh as the verbal criticism that "detachment" faced at the beginning; after "anti-cancer me", Lan Li, who once again challenged comedy performance, was unexpectedly refreshed. The public impression once again brought a novel performance.It can be said with certainty that the blue gift of the second Oscar statuette has been won not long ago, and he still maintains his consistently high level.This is enough.What's more, even if it is on the street, Lanly can still detonate the reporter's discussion boom; therefore, this has no effect on the reporter."So, how do you feel?" Waiting for Lanly to finish reading the newsletter, Bradley threw an introduction.Lan Li pursed the corner of his mouth, "I really want to see the two works of "Sor's Son" and "Aokihara Shuhai". UU Reading www.uukanshu.com" one has the highest score and the other has the lowest score.Bradley couldn't help laughing.Gavin asked curiously, "Why? Is it just because of good and bad reviews?""Part of the reason. I have to admit, what kind of work Gus filmed in order to get the media to score such a low score." Lan Li glanced at the newsletter again: six and one star, four media outlets refused to comment. This is true. "If I remember correctly, when the "Elephant" premiered in Cannes, because the controversy was so great, there were even reporters fighting at the media conference. I guess whether this work is also the case. Is that so?"In the last life, Lan Li never watched the work "Aokigahara Shuhai" because he felt it was unnecessary, but now his perspective and thinking have changed, and he does have some curiosity."Previously, Christopher Nolan personally confirmed that the number one choice for Interstellar Crossing was Matthew McConaughey, but in the end he chose you to play. After missing this work, Matthew's works in the past two years seem to be all It has not been able to meet expectations and is generally considered to be the curse of the little golden man. This time the "Aokigahara Shukai" is facing such an encounter. What do you think?"
