Chapter 372: 372
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
The twenty-seventh Sundance Film Festival came to an end. In the feature film department, "Crazy Love" became the biggest winner, while the documentary was fully harvested by the "Eternal Car God".
Amidst the noise, Lan Li once again became the focus of attention. This is the fourth time the Sundance Film Festival has awarded a special jury award to an actor in the past ten years.
The first three times were Monique who was “cherished” in 2009, Amy Adams (as) of “Beetle” in 2005 and Lou-taylor-i of “Thumbsucker”, 2001 Tom Wilkinson (t-wilkinson) and Sissy-Spaek (sissy-spaek) of "Love of Non-Lun".
Among the three previous winners, four have received Oscar nominations for acting, and one has won the Berlin Silver Bear.
At the same time, this is the first time in the past ten years that the Sundance Film Festival has awarded the Jury Special Award to an actor individually. Whether it was in 2009 or 2005, there are other co-winners.
Undoubtedly, Renly, who has dedicated excellent performances in two independent films "Buried Alive" and "Crazy Love", immediately became a hot figure in the independent film industry, and his popularity and recognition spread rapidly at a speed visible to the naked eye. Open.
People are beginning to discuss whether Lanli’s turning out is short-lived, like a shooting star across the night sky, just shining for a moment, and then quickly declining; or talented, down-to-earth slowly honing his acting skills, and becoming another famous person in history. The old drama bones; or the exhaustion of Jiang Lang's talents, the rising momentum when young and vigorous is extremely fierce, raising the expectations of society high, but then encountering bottlenecks and quickly quieting...
This is Hollywood, everything is possible.
What's more, the colorful colors of Vanity Fair are always dazzling, and you get lost in it without knowing it, and then you can't find the way back to the right track.
Lan Li is only 21 years old this year. He is vigorous, energetic, impulsive and wanton. He wants to continue his career as an actor for ten, twenty years or even longer. He will never get lost, sleepy, and tired. This is definitely not an easy task. The story of hurting Zhongyong is countless in Hollywood.
How hot the sight focused on Lan Li, how turbulent the mixed voices of doubt, curiosity, scrutiny, praise, and criticism are.
The future is too far away, no one can predict, but the eighty-third Oscar is already close at hand. After the Sundance Film Festival ended, Lanly won the jury special award with "Love Crazy", so the suspense of whether "Buried Alive" could receive an Oscar nomination suddenly became popular.
This year, the "Generation Y" actor's momentum is too strong. In previous years, the average age of Oscar's best actor has hovered between forty and forty-five. This is also a common phenomenon throughout Hollywood, but this time, three Actors under the age of twelve ushered in a blowout, presenting a scene of prosperity.
Five actors, including James Franco, Ryan Gosling, Jesse Eisenberg, Jack Gyllenhaal, and Lanly Hall, all have the ability to be nominated; and in addition to them, three Actors over the age of twelve are slightly weaker, but they still cannot be underestimated. It seems that it is not too unexpected for anyone to be in the top position and anyone left behind. So who can have the last laugh?
Under much attention, the chairman of the American Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Tom-Sherak (t-sherak), together with last year's Best Supporting Actress winner Monique, announced the nomination list at the Samuel Godwin Theater.
Among all the awards in the awards ceremony, the best film is always the most watched project. Even though the number of nominations has increased from five to ten, the attention has not diminished, and this year is no exception.
The two award season leaders of "The King's Speech" and "Social Network" won the nomination without any suspense; "The kids are all very good" swept across the music comedy category, and the nomination was expected.
"Pirates of Dreams" used the attitude of a commercial film to kill the Quartet, with a double harvest at the box office and word-of-mouth, and successfully won the nomination, making a new breakthrough in the career of director Christopher Nolan.
Also winning the nomination was the acclaimed "Toy Story 3", which became the first cartoon to be among the best films since the creation of the best animated feature film department alone, and the first since "Beauty and the Beast". Two cartoons that gained such honor.
In addition to these five works, "Black Swan", "127 Hours", and "Fighter" were repeatedly mentioned during the awards season, and their performances were particularly eye-catching, and they were undoubtedly nominated. Continue the previous strength.
But above the last two seats, there were not big or small upsets.
The "Thunder of the Earth", which had not been nominated for the Golden Globes before, achieved a reversal at the last moment, broke through the siege, and occupied a place in the battle for the best picture.
This work directed by the Coen brothers, although it landed at the New York Film Festival on December 14th and received critical acclaim for the blockbuster film, it still failed to win the Golden Globe Award; after that, it was officially screened on the 22nd. Word of mouth has been rising all the way up, and it is generally believed that it is much higher than the two brothers’ “serious men” last year and the “burn after reading” the year before, and the level is almost comparable to the “old no one to rely on” who won the best Oscars. .
Missing the selection time of the "Three Oscars", "Tear of the Earth" still strongly entered the Oscar nomination list. The Coen brothers are worthy of being the most outstanding directors in the industry in the past five years. They will "rely on strength at the nomination stage." The profound meaning of this is played to the fullest.
The last seat was taken away by the "Bones of Winter". The winner of the Sundance Jury Award last year was acclaimed throughout the year. The momentum continued from the beginning of the year to the end of the year, and he successfully ranked among the top ten nominations for Oscars. .
Strictly speaking, the nomination of "Winter's Bones" cannot be regarded as unpopular, but it is indeed a bitter struggle to stand out. It is defeating "Blue Valentine's Day", "Buried alive", and "Barney's". It won the nomination after many outstanding works such as "Life" and "The Thief in the City" and became the most representative work of independent films in 2010.
In this way, the ten nominations for the best picture have all been announced, and no popular works have been missed.
Similarly, in terms of the number of nominations, these ten works are naturally the absolute protagonists.
"The King's Speech" led the way with twelve nominations, including the best director, best actor, best supporting actor, best supporting actress, best original screenplay, best movie editing, etc. With a strong posture that came from behind, with a peaceful and conservative pattern, he successfully conquered the hearts of the judges and completed the counterattack in the nomination stage.
The Weinstein brothers are really superb.
The "social network", which had been leading the way before, has noticeably slowed down in the final stage of the nomination, and only received eight nominations.
Although the best director, best actor, best adapted screenplay, best film editing and other major departments are still not missing, the miss of best supporting actor is staggering. More importantly, the film, which is known for its technology, was completely overtaken in the technical department by the "King’s Speech", which is known for its performance and story. This is not good news.
"The King's Speech" vs. "Social Network", this is the main theme of this year's awards season. The "Social Network" surprised everyone with the sharpness and competence of the 21st century and successfully led the first half; "The King's Speech" The retro elegance of the last century followed closely, bringing the conservatism and narcissism of the courtyard to the extreme, and coming from behind.
This duel will continue to the Oscars awards ceremony. However, after the nomination was announced, the "Thunder of the Earth" received ten nominations in an instant, surpassing the "social network" in one fell swoop, followed by the "king's speech". With great momentum, the situation of the awards season suddenly became confusing.
The nominations for "Land Thunder" include important awards such as best director, best actor, best supporting actress, and best adapted screenplay. The only disadvantage is that it lost the nomination for best film editing, but the overall momentum It is not inferior to "The King's Speech".
Not only are the Coen brothers sitting in town, but also the blessings of heavyweight names such as Jeff Bridges, Roger-Deakins, Scott-Rudin, etc., the appeal of the Academy is absolutely unacceptable. A small look, enough to compete with the Weinstein brothers.
What’s more interesting is that in addition to “Thunder of the Land”, the “Inception”, which has received eight nominations, and the “Fighter”, who has received seven nominations, are also very popular. The former has an absolute advantage in the technical department, and the latter. It has a strong impact in the performance department.
In other words, ~www.novelhall.com~ originally thought it was a two-person turn, but now it seems to be a melee of five works. You can see this pattern only from the nomination of the best director.
The Coen brothers of "Thunder", David Fincher of "Social Networks", Tom-Hooper of "The King's Speech", David-o-Russell of "Fighter" o-russell), Darren Aronosky of "Black Swan", successfully won the best director nomination.
As a commercial director, Christopher Nolan was once again ignored by the hospital after "Batman: The Dark Knight". He still has a long way to go if he wants to copy the footsteps of James Cameron and Peter Jackson. The replacement of Christopher was surprisingly with Darren, who was infinitely successful during the awards season with the "Black Swan".
Before that, Darren, who dedicated "Dream Requiem", "Wrestling King", "Cherish the Source" and other masterpieces, finally managed to stand out and received his first Oscar nomination in his career, which is truly famous Return.
On the whole, the five works fell into a melee and became the most vivid interpretation after the 83rd Oscar nominations were announced. The "social network" that has lost its leading edge, the "king's speech" that has been chasing the momentum, the scheming "thunder of the earth", coupled with the "inception" and "fighter" whose advantages and disadvantages are particularly obvious, this year The Oscar awards ceremony is bound to be extremely exciting.
Of course, we can't forget the "black swan" who is eyeing the eye.
Compared with the satisfactory results of the Golden Globes, the announcement of the Oscar nomination list has successfully ignited the topic, and people are full of expectations. There are still many things to watch in each individual item. ()
Please remember the domain name of this book's first publication:. Reading URL of Biquge Mobile Version:
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
The twenty-seventh Sundance Film Festival came to an end. In the feature film department, "Crazy Love" became the biggest winner, while the documentary was fully harvested by the "Eternal Car God".
Amidst the noise, Lan Li once again became the focus of attention. This is the fourth time the Sundance Film Festival has awarded a special jury award to an actor in the past ten years.
The first three times were Monique who was “cherished” in 2009, Amy Adams (as) of “Beetle” in 2005 and Lou-taylor-i of “Thumbsucker”, 2001 Tom Wilkinson (t-wilkinson) and Sissy-Spaek (sissy-spaek) of "Love of Non-Lun".
Among the three previous winners, four have received Oscar nominations for acting, and one has won the Berlin Silver Bear.
At the same time, this is the first time in the past ten years that the Sundance Film Festival has awarded the Jury Special Award to an actor individually. Whether it was in 2009 or 2005, there are other co-winners.
Undoubtedly, Renly, who has dedicated excellent performances in two independent films "Buried Alive" and "Crazy Love", immediately became a hot figure in the independent film industry, and his popularity and recognition spread rapidly at a speed visible to the naked eye. Open.
People are beginning to discuss whether Lanli’s turning out is short-lived, like a shooting star across the night sky, just shining for a moment, and then quickly declining; or talented, down-to-earth slowly honing his acting skills, and becoming another famous person in history. The old drama bones; or the exhaustion of Jiang Lang's talents, the rising momentum when young and vigorous is extremely fierce, raising the expectations of society high, but then encountering bottlenecks and quickly quieting...
This is Hollywood, everything is possible.
What's more, the colorful colors of Vanity Fair are always dazzling, and you get lost in it without knowing it, and then you can't find the way back to the right track.
Lan Li is only 21 years old this year. He is vigorous, energetic, impulsive and wanton. He wants to continue his career as an actor for ten, twenty years or even longer. He will never get lost, sleepy, and tired. This is definitely not an easy task. The story of hurting Zhongyong is countless in Hollywood.
How hot the sight focused on Lan Li, how turbulent the mixed voices of doubt, curiosity, scrutiny, praise, and criticism are.
The future is too far away, no one can predict, but the eighty-third Oscar is already close at hand. After the Sundance Film Festival ended, Lanly won the jury special award with "Love Crazy", so the suspense of whether "Buried Alive" could receive an Oscar nomination suddenly became popular.
This year, the "Generation Y" actor's momentum is too strong. In previous years, the average age of Oscar's best actor has hovered between forty and forty-five. This is also a common phenomenon throughout Hollywood, but this time, three Actors under the age of twelve ushered in a blowout, presenting a scene of prosperity.
Five actors, including James Franco, Ryan Gosling, Jesse Eisenberg, Jack Gyllenhaal, and Lanly Hall, all have the ability to be nominated; and in addition to them, three Actors over the age of twelve are slightly weaker, but they still cannot be underestimated. It seems that it is not too unexpected for anyone to be in the top position and anyone left behind. So who can have the last laugh?
Under much attention, the chairman of the American Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Tom-Sherak (t-sherak), together with last year's Best Supporting Actress winner Monique, announced the nomination list at the Samuel Godwin Theater.
Among all the awards in the awards ceremony, the best film is always the most watched project. Even though the number of nominations has increased from five to ten, the attention has not diminished, and this year is no exception.
The two award season leaders of "The King's Speech" and "Social Network" won the nomination without any suspense; "The kids are all very good" swept across the music comedy category, and the nomination was expected.
"Pirates of Dreams" used the attitude of a commercial film to kill the Quartet, with a double harvest at the box office and word-of-mouth, and successfully won the nomination, making a new breakthrough in the career of director Christopher Nolan.
Also winning the nomination was the acclaimed "Toy Story 3", which became the first cartoon to be among the best films since the creation of the best animated feature film department alone, and the first since "Beauty and the Beast". Two cartoons that gained such honor.
In addition to these five works, "Black Swan", "127 Hours", and "Fighter" were repeatedly mentioned during the awards season, and their performances were particularly eye-catching, and they were undoubtedly nominated. Continue the previous strength.
But above the last two seats, there were not big or small upsets.
The "Thunder of the Earth", which had not been nominated for the Golden Globes before, achieved a reversal at the last moment, broke through the siege, and occupied a place in the battle for the best picture.
This work directed by the Coen brothers, although it landed at the New York Film Festival on December 14th and received critical acclaim for the blockbuster film, it still failed to win the Golden Globe Award; after that, it was officially screened on the 22nd. Word of mouth has been rising all the way up, and it is generally believed that it is much higher than the two brothers’ “serious men” last year and the “burn after reading” the year before, and the level is almost comparable to the “old no one to rely on” who won the best Oscars. .
Missing the selection time of the "Three Oscars", "Tear of the Earth" still strongly entered the Oscar nomination list. The Coen brothers are worthy of being the most outstanding directors in the industry in the past five years. They will "rely on strength at the nomination stage." The profound meaning of this is played to the fullest.
The last seat was taken away by the "Bones of Winter". The winner of the Sundance Jury Award last year was acclaimed throughout the year. The momentum continued from the beginning of the year to the end of the year, and he successfully ranked among the top ten nominations for Oscars. .
Strictly speaking, the nomination of "Winter's Bones" cannot be regarded as unpopular, but it is indeed a bitter struggle to stand out. It is defeating "Blue Valentine's Day", "Buried alive", and "Barney's". It won the nomination after many outstanding works such as "Life" and "The Thief in the City" and became the most representative work of independent films in 2010.
In this way, the ten nominations for the best picture have all been announced, and no popular works have been missed.
Similarly, in terms of the number of nominations, these ten works are naturally the absolute protagonists.
"The King's Speech" led the way with twelve nominations, including the best director, best actor, best supporting actor, best supporting actress, best original screenplay, best movie editing, etc. With a strong posture that came from behind, with a peaceful and conservative pattern, he successfully conquered the hearts of the judges and completed the counterattack in the nomination stage.
The Weinstein brothers are really superb.
The "social network", which had been leading the way before, has noticeably slowed down in the final stage of the nomination, and only received eight nominations.
Although the best director, best actor, best adapted screenplay, best film editing and other major departments are still not missing, the miss of best supporting actor is staggering. More importantly, the film, which is known for its technology, was completely overtaken in the technical department by the "King’s Speech", which is known for its performance and story. This is not good news.
"The King's Speech" vs. "Social Network", this is the main theme of this year's awards season. The "Social Network" surprised everyone with the sharpness and competence of the 21st century and successfully led the first half; "The King's Speech" The retro elegance of the last century followed closely, bringing the conservatism and narcissism of the courtyard to the extreme, and coming from behind.
This duel will continue to the Oscars awards ceremony. However, after the nomination was announced, the "Thunder of the Earth" received ten nominations in an instant, surpassing the "social network" in one fell swoop, followed by the "king's speech". With great momentum, the situation of the awards season suddenly became confusing.
The nominations for "Land Thunder" include important awards such as best director, best actor, best supporting actress, and best adapted screenplay. The only disadvantage is that it lost the nomination for best film editing, but the overall momentum It is not inferior to "The King's Speech".
Not only are the Coen brothers sitting in town, but also the blessings of heavyweight names such as Jeff Bridges, Roger-Deakins, Scott-Rudin, etc., the appeal of the Academy is absolutely unacceptable. A small look, enough to compete with the Weinstein brothers.
What’s more interesting is that in addition to “Thunder of the Land”, the “Inception”, which has received eight nominations, and the “Fighter”, who has received seven nominations, are also very popular. The former has an absolute advantage in the technical department, and the latter. It has a strong impact in the performance department.
In other words, ~www.novelhall.com~ originally thought it was a two-person turn, but now it seems to be a melee of five works. You can see this pattern only from the nomination of the best director.
The Coen brothers of "Thunder", David Fincher of "Social Networks", Tom-Hooper of "The King's Speech", David-o-Russell of "Fighter" o-russell), Darren Aronosky of "Black Swan", successfully won the best director nomination.
As a commercial director, Christopher Nolan was once again ignored by the hospital after "Batman: The Dark Knight". He still has a long way to go if he wants to copy the footsteps of James Cameron and Peter Jackson. The replacement of Christopher was surprisingly with Darren, who was infinitely successful during the awards season with the "Black Swan".
Before that, Darren, who dedicated "Dream Requiem", "Wrestling King", "Cherish the Source" and other masterpieces, finally managed to stand out and received his first Oscar nomination in his career, which is truly famous Return.
On the whole, the five works fell into a melee and became the most vivid interpretation after the 83rd Oscar nominations were announced. The "social network" that has lost its leading edge, the "king's speech" that has been chasing the momentum, the scheming "thunder of the earth", coupled with the "inception" and "fighter" whose advantages and disadvantages are particularly obvious, this year The Oscar awards ceremony is bound to be extremely exciting.
Of course, we can't forget the "black swan" who is eyeing the eye.
Compared with the satisfactory results of the Golden Globes, the announcement of the Oscar nomination list has successfully ignited the topic, and people are full of expectations. There are still many things to watch in each individual item. ()
Please remember the domain name of this book's first publication:. Reading URL of Biquge Mobile Version:
The twenty-seventh Sundance Film Festival came to an end. In the feature film department, "Crazy Love" became the biggest winner, while the documentary was fully harvested by the "Eternal Car God".Amidst the noise, Lan Li once again became the focus of attention. This is the fourth time the Sundance Film Festival has awarded a special jury award to an actor in the past ten years.The first three times were Monique who was cherished in 2009, Amy Adams as of Beetle in 2005 and Lou-taylor-i of Thumbsucker, 2001 Tom Wilkinson t-wilkinson and Sissy-Spaek sissy-spaek of "Love of Non-Lun".Among the three previous winners, four have received Oscar nominations for acting, and one has won the Berlin Silver Bear.At the same time, this is the first time in the past ten years that the Sundance Film Festival has awarded the Jury Special Award to an actor individually. Whether it was in 2009 or 2005, there are other co-winners.Undoubtedly, Renly, who has dedicated excellent performances in two independent films "Buried Alive" and "Crazy Love", immediately became a hot figure in the independent film industry, and his popularity and recognition spread rapidly at a speed visible to the naked eye. Open.People are beginning to discuss whether Lanli's turning out is short-lived, like a shooting star across the night sky, just shining for a moment, and then quickly declining; or talented, down-to-earth slowly honing his acting skills, and becoming another famous person in history. The old drama bones; or the exhaustion of Jiang Lang's talents, the rising momentum when young and vigorous is extremely fierce, raising the expectations of society high, but then encountering bottlenecks and quickly quieting...This is Hollywood, everything is possible.What's more, the colorful colors of Vanity Fair are always dazzling, and you get lost in it without knowing it, and then you can't find the way back to the right track.Lan Li is only 21 years old this year. He is vigorous, energetic, impulsive and wanton. He wants to continue his career as an actor for ten, twenty years or even longer. He will never get lost, sleepy, and tired. This is definitely not an easy task. The story of hurting Zhongyong is countless in Hollywood.How hot the sight focused on Lan Li, how turbulent the mixed voices of doubt, curiosity, scrutiny, praise, and criticism are.The future is too far away, no one can predict, but the eighty-third Oscar is already close at hand. After the Sundance Film Festival ended, Lanly won the jury special award with "Love Crazy", so the suspense of whether "Buried Alive" could receive an Oscar nomination suddenly became popular.This year, the "Generation Y" actor's momentum is too strong. In previous years, the average age of Oscar's best actor has hovered between forty and forty-five. This is also a common phenomenon throughout Hollywood, but this time, three Actors under the age of twelve ushered in a blowout, presenting a scene of prosperity.Five actors, including James Franco, Ryan Gosling, Jesse Eisenberg, Jack Gyllenhaal, and Lanly Hall, all have the ability to be nominated; and in addition to them, three Actors over the age of twelve are slightly weaker, but they still cannot be underestimated. It seems that it is not too unexpected for anyone to be in the top position and anyone left behind. So who can have the last laugh?Under much attention, the chairman of the American Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Tom-Sherak t-sherak, together with last year's Best Supporting Actress winner Monique, announced the nomination list at the Samuel Godwin Theater.Among all the awards in the awards ceremony, the best film is always the most watched project. Even though the number of nominations has increased from five to ten, the attention has not diminished, and this year is no exception.The two award season leaders of "The King's Speech" and "Social Network" won the nomination without any suspense; "The kids are all very good" swept across the music comedy category, and the nomination was expected."Pirates of Dreams" used the attitude of a commercial film to kill the Quartet, with a double harvest at the box office and word-of-mouth, and successfully won the nomination, making a new breakthrough in the career of director Christopher Nolan.Also winning the nomination was the acclaimed "Toy Story 3", which became the first cartoon to be among the best films since the creation of the best animated feature film department alone, and the first since "Beauty and the Beast". Two cartoons that gained such honor.In addition to these five works, "Black Swan", "127 Hours", and "Fighter" were repeatedly mentioned during the awards season, and their performances were particularly eye-catching, and they were undoubtedly nominated. Continue the previous strength.But above the last two seats, there were not big or small upsets.The "Thunder of the Earth", which had not been nominated for the Golden Globes before, achieved a reversal at the last moment, broke through the siege, and occupied a place in the battle for the best picture.This work directed by the Coen brothers, although it landed at the New York Film Festival on December 14th and received critical acclaim for the blockbuster film, it still failed to win the Golden Globe Award; after that, it was officially screened on the 22nd. Word of mouth has been rising all the way up, and it is generally believed that it is much higher than the two brothers' serious men last year and the burn after reading the year before, and the level is almost comparable to the old no one to rely on who won the best Oscars. .Missing the selection time of the "Three Oscars", "Tear of the Earth" still strongly entered the Oscar nomination list. The Coen brothers are worthy of being the most outstanding directors in the industry in the past five years. They will "rely on strength at the nomination stage." The profound meaning of this is played to the fullest.The last seat was taken away by the "Bones of Winter". The winner of the Sundance Jury Award last year was acclaimed throughout the year. The momentum continued from the beginning of the year to the end of the year, and he successfully ranked among the top ten nominations for Oscars. .Strictly speaking, the nomination of "Winter's Bones" cannot be regarded as unpopular, but it is indeed a bitter struggle to stand out. It is defeating "Blue Valentine's Day", "Buried alive", and "Barney's". It won the nomination after many outstanding works such as "Life" and "The Thief in the City" and became the most representative work of independent films in 2010.In this way, the ten nominations for the best picture have all been announced, and no popular works have been missed.Similarly, in terms of the number of nominations, these ten works are naturally the absolute protagonists."The King's Speech" led the way with twelve nominations, including the best director, best actor, best supporting actor, best supporting actress, best original screenplay, best movie editing, etc. With a strong posture that came from behind, with a peaceful and conservative pattern, he successfully conquered the hearts of the judges and completed the counterattack in the nomination stage.The Weinstein brothers are really superb.The "social network", which had been leading the way before, has noticeably slowed down in the final stage of the nomination, and only received eight nominations.Although the best director, best actor, best adapted screenplay, best film editing and other major departments are still not missing, the miss of best supporting actor is staggering. More importantly, the film, which is known for its technology, was completely overtaken in the technical department by the "King's Speech", which is known for its performance and story. This is not good news."The King's Speech" vs. "Social Network", this is the main theme of this year's awards season. The "Social Network" surprised everyone with the sharpness and competence of the 21st century and successfully led the first half; "The King's Speech" The retro elegance of the last century followed closely, bringing the conservatism and narcissism of the courtyard to the extreme, and coming from behind.This duel will continue to the Oscars awards ceremony. However, after the nomination was announced, the "Thunder of the Earth" received ten nominations in an instant, surpassing the "social network" in one fell swoop, followed by the "king's speech". With great momentum, the situation of the awards season suddenly became confusing.The nominations for "Land Thunder" include important awards such as best director, best actor, best supporting actress, and best adapted screenplay. The only disadvantage is that it lost the nomination for best film editing, but the overall momentum It is not inferior to "The King's Speech".Not only are the Coen brothers sitting in town, but also the blessings of heavyweight names such as Jeff Bridges, Roger-Deakins, Scott-Rudin, etc., the appeal of the Academy is absolutely unacceptable. A small look, enough to compete with the Weinstein brothers.What's more interesting is that in addition to Thunder of the Land, the Inception, which has received eight nominations, and the Fighter, who has received seven nominations, are also very popular. The former has an absolute advantage in the technical department, and the latter. It has a strong impact in the performance department.In other words, ~www.novelhall.com~ originally thought it was a two-person turn, but now it seems to be a melee of five works. You can see this pattern only from the nomination of the best director.The Coen brothers of "Thunder", David Fincher of "Social Networks", Tom-Hooper of "The King's Speech", David-o-Russell of "Fighter" o-russell, Darren Aronosky of "Black Swan", successfully won the best director nomination.As a commercial director, Christopher Nolan was once again ignored by the hospital after "Batman: The Dark Knight". He still has a long way to go if he wants to copy the footsteps of James Cameron and Peter Jackson. The replacement of Christopher was surprisingly with Darren, who was infinitely successful during the awards season with the "Black Swan".Before that, Darren, who dedicated "Dream Requiem", "Wrestling King", "Cherish the Source" and other masterpieces, finally managed to stand out and received his first Oscar nomination in his career, which is truly famous Return.On the whole, the five works fell into a melee and became the most vivid interpretation after the 83rd Oscar nominations were announced. The "social network" that has lost its leading edge, the "king's speech" that has been chasing the momentum, the scheming "thunder of the earth", coupled with the "inception" and "fighter" whose advantages and disadvantages are particularly obvious, this year The Oscar awards ceremony is bound to be extremely exciting.Of course, we can't forget the "black swan" who is eyeing the eye.Compared with the satisfactory results of the Golden Globes, the announcement of the Oscar nomination list has successfully ignited the topic, and people are full of expectations. There are still many things to watch in each individual item. Please remember the domain name of this book's first publication:. Reading URL of Biquge Mobile Version:
