Chapter 442: 442
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
The door of the apartment fell into a weird silence, and you could even hear the wind whistling in your ears. This is for a press conference, for a press conference with menacing siege and suppression, for the mighty and arrogant Hollywood expedition, it is a great shame.
Lan Li looked around for a week, leaving enough time, and found that the reporters still had no plans to speak out, so he smiled and nodded, "Then, that's it for today. The crew still has work, so don't delay everyone. I'm working." After speaking, Lan Li turned around and left and returned to the apartment.
Today Lanly’s response is really unexpected time and time again. Lanly seems to totally ignore the negative news. If it weren’t for the repeated persecution of reporters, Lanly would still not respond. . Is such a frank and honest way of responding really stupid and naive? Or do those who clean up clean themselves? But whatever it was, it pushed the reporters into an extremely embarrassing situation.
Is this follow-up report a newspaper? Still not reporting it?
Dangling, the door of the peacock-blue apartment was closed, completely cutting off the reporters' sights, and then everyone looked at each other, embarrassed, and finally bowed their heads and hurriedly turned to leave. The hustle and bustle of the crowd just dispersed silently.
But after leaving, the impact of today's press conference has just begun to ferment.
Work, work, or work. This is the last sentence of Lan Li’s conclusion of the press conference. Both inside and outside the words are emphasized: The "anti-cancer me" crew does not need to hype, and refuses to hype. I hope the news media can stop and return to their regular work. , Don’t keep chasing after others.
So, it's the media making and taking it from beginning to end?
Just thinking of this possibility, everyone's stomach is a little hot. Think about it carefully, how did this news get to this point? First the "National Inquirer", then the official statement of the crew, and then... "Entertainment Weekly"? Damn "Entertainment Weekly"!
Cornell, sitting in the driver's seat, could no longer restrain his anger. He picked up the orange juice next to him and poured it down his throat fiercely, but when it was poured, the uncontrollable anger exploded. , Tightening his fist, squeezed the entire plastic bottle, the orange juice inside was spilled everywhere, but he couldn't take care of it at all.
Suddenly, the chills all jumped up, one after another. Then Cornell started sneezing, couldn't stop, and all the anger disappeared without a trace. What is going on with this inexplicable resentment?
On the way out of the apartment, almost all reporters started to have trouble: how should this news be written?
During the whole meeting, they were ridiculed fiercely for a while. It was almost 18 martial arts taking turns to battle. They could almost be said to be weak and incomplete. This embarrassing situation is really ashamed.
So now, how should they report? This is a problem, a serious problem, but for the uncrowned king, things have never been so complicated. All they need to do is to choose a position.
There is no need to wait until the next day. In the afternoon, the news exploded like a mushroom cloud, pushing the recent wave of news to a new peak.
On the whole, the reporters were divided into two factions, one faction intensified, and the other faction turning arrows.
"Entertainment Weekly" deserves to be a critical camp, "Renly-Hall: Yes, those are true." Just this one title is already scary enough.
In the article, Cornell emphasized that Lanly confessed to the crew's accusations and did not mean to admit mistakes in the slightest. That upright posture seemed to take everything for granted; and at the end, Cornell said, " The journalist sent by our journal once again gave Lan Li the opportunity to explain his rebuttal, but he refused.
Throughout the article, Cornell’s Lan Li shows a sense of pretentiousness, arrogance, and arrogance, which coincides with the previous revelations in the "anti-cancer me" crew. Ignoring the rest of the matter, completely focused on the revelations of the crew and vividly portrayed Lan Li's arrogant personality.
In addition, "Entertainment Weekly" has many allies
"Len Li-Hall admits all the accusations frankly and refuses to repent", "Shirking responsibility, Ren Li and reporters officially launched", "Made at the Kardashian family, Lan Li provoked disputes again", "Arrogant and confident : I got the nomination based on my own strength", "Hall admits that he has a close relationship with Spielberg and Hanks", "Malicious hype? This is just the beginning"...
These condemning reports are really not a few, and they have brought out the profound meaning of the out of context. The same sentence, after switching different perspectives, will also interpret different answers, not to mention a meeting full of content. They didn't lie, what they reported was the facts, but the result was completely different from the atmosphere at the reporter's meeting.
One pen can change the whole world. This is the fundamental reason why journalists are called "Uncrowned Kings".
However, compared to the media that has become more critical and critical, the media that reverses arrows and changes opinions have an absolute advantage, and in a short time, it reverses the direction of the entire report.
"Len Li-Hall: The crew never thought about hype. So, who is making trouble?"
"Being fully focused on the new filming, the'anti-cancer me' is worth looking forward to."
"Another victim of entertaining to death: Renly Hall. Who is in charge of all this?"
"A single-minded performance fanatic, but accidentally contracted a terminal illness? Is this a new method of college public relations, or is it the cruel persecution of jealous eyes?"
"Reject the hype and focus on acting. Lanly-Hall responded to doubts with practical actions."
"Facts speak louder than words, time has its own arbitrariness! Deep in the whirlpool, Lanly-Hall shows a rare and precious grandeur!"
...
These supporters were more angry than one, and more excited than the other, as if they did not participate in the previous fall into the trap. They were eager to stand up and wave the flag for Lan Li. If possible, they would even give Lan Li a "Love Post". The banner of "Dedication" expresses one's sincerity.
Not only that, but Bradley Adams of The New York Times published an editorial with the title "Renley-Hall's Sorrow. Who is helping it!"
In this article, Bradley pointed the arrow sharply at the uncrowned king who "lost the pursuit of the truth itself because of entertainment to death". He emphasized that Lan Li had never thought about hype, let alone using his background. Making essays has repeatedly become a tool for interested people to concoct news focus. This is a sad and sad fact for the news industry in the fast-food era.
"When Lanly-Hall devoted himself to filming, the media continued to harass the stability of the crew; when Lanly-Hall devoted himself to character research, the media sought their own interests in the name of justice; -When Hall refused to join in the dirty work, the media ignored the dirty water.
‘I sincerely hope that reporters don’t pay attention to our crew, and don’t pay attention to me. Let us put our work into work. ’
These are the original words of Lan Li-Hall in the interview. What kind of dilemma did he face that led to these words? It is worth thinking about by everyone. "
This "New York Times" article laid the tone and trend of the entire news, outlined the background of the era of entertainment to death, and really aimed the spearhead at the media itself, which is not to compromise in order to create explosions, especially "Entertainment Weekly" instantly became the target of countless netizens. This time, they also tasted the taste of Lan Li.
Before that, the netizens who had been condemning Lanli directly pointed their guns at "Entertainment Weekly" without any buffering ground, just like a goldfish, with only seven seconds of memory, no guilt, no burden, There is no entanglement. To be precise, without any consciousness, go with the flow and begin to criticize new objects. However, this time "Entertainment Weekly" just hit the gun.
In addition, Daisy Lucas of Vanity Fair followed this incident from a different perspective.
"The seven deadly sins of Lanly-Hall have conquered Hollywood's desire/hope symbol~www.novelhall.com~ This is the title of a column written by Daisy. In the article, Daisy believes that the beginning of the "Pacific War" By the upcoming Oscar, although Lan Li has only appeared in front of the public for only one year, the talent, talent, temperament and personality displayed by Lan Li have made people yearn for it, and easily gained a good popularity. This made Lanli a target of public criticism and triggered a wave of opposition this time.
Daisy cited the so-called "seven deadly sins", but she was actually praising Lan Li, thinking that Lan Li had succeeded in occupying a place in Hollywood with her charm and strength. Such a posture turned out to make people eye-catching.
But at the same time, Daisy also believes that Lanly needs to prove himself further. It proves that "buried alive" and "love crazy" are not just a flash in the pan, prove that the Oscar nomination can withstand the test, and it also proves that absolute strength will shine after all.
"Maybe, the'anti-cancer me' can't bear the weight of refuting the doubt; but Lan Li, who is dedicated and dedicated to acting, has already proved his identity as an actor. He is just an actor."
"Vanity Fair" expressed its solidarity with Lan Li in a gimmicky yet sincere way.
After the reporter's meeting, this time the "Ren Li-Hall" incident seemed to have become more and more intense. The media began to verbalize, and both the pros and the cons refused to give up, although the current support for Lan Li was occupied It has the upper hand, and still has an absolute advantage, but the opposition is not timid and unswervingly continues its protest gesture.
Bustling and lively, everyone's eyes temporarily left Seattle, but began to spread toward the entire North America. Not only the paper media, but also the Internet, even the talk show can not help but join the ranks of ridicule, things seem to get worse.
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
The door of the apartment fell into a weird silence, and you could even hear the wind whistling in your ears. This is for a press conference, for a press conference with menacing siege and suppression, for the mighty and arrogant Hollywood expedition, it is a great shame.
Lan Li looked around for a week, leaving enough time, and found that the reporters still had no plans to speak out, so he smiled and nodded, "Then, that's it for today. The crew still has work, so don't delay everyone. I'm working." After speaking, Lan Li turned around and left and returned to the apartment.
Today Lanly’s response is really unexpected time and time again. Lanly seems to totally ignore the negative news. If it weren’t for the repeated persecution of reporters, Lanly would still not respond. . Is such a frank and honest way of responding really stupid and naive? Or do those who clean up clean themselves? But whatever it was, it pushed the reporters into an extremely embarrassing situation.
Is this follow-up report a newspaper? Still not reporting it?
Dangling, the door of the peacock-blue apartment was closed, completely cutting off the reporters' sights, and then everyone looked at each other, embarrassed, and finally bowed their heads and hurriedly turned to leave. The hustle and bustle of the crowd just dispersed silently.
But after leaving, the impact of today's press conference has just begun to ferment.
Work, work, or work. This is the last sentence of Lan Li’s conclusion of the press conference. Both inside and outside the words are emphasized: The "anti-cancer me" crew does not need to hype, and refuses to hype. I hope the news media can stop and return to their regular work. , Don’t keep chasing after others.
So, it's the media making and taking it from beginning to end?
Just thinking of this possibility, everyone's stomach is a little hot. Think about it carefully, how did this news get to this point? First the "National Inquirer", then the official statement of the crew, and then... "Entertainment Weekly"? Damn "Entertainment Weekly"!
Cornell, sitting in the driver's seat, could no longer restrain his anger. He picked up the orange juice next to him and poured it down his throat fiercely, but when it was poured, the uncontrollable anger exploded. , Tightening his fist, squeezed the entire plastic bottle, the orange juice inside was spilled everywhere, but he couldn't take care of it at all.
Suddenly, the chills all jumped up, one after another. Then Cornell started sneezing, couldn't stop, and all the anger disappeared without a trace. What is going on with this inexplicable resentment?
On the way out of the apartment, almost all reporters started to have trouble: how should this news be written?
During the whole meeting, they were ridiculed fiercely for a while. It was almost 18 martial arts taking turns to battle. They could almost be said to be weak and incomplete. This embarrassing situation is really ashamed.
So now, how should they report? This is a problem, a serious problem, but for the uncrowned king, things have never been so complicated. All they need to do is to choose a position.
There is no need to wait until the next day. In the afternoon, the news exploded like a mushroom cloud, pushing the recent wave of news to a new peak.
On the whole, the reporters were divided into two factions, one faction intensified, and the other faction turning arrows.
"Entertainment Weekly" deserves to be a critical camp, "Renly-Hall: Yes, those are true." Just this one title is already scary enough.
In the article, Cornell emphasized that Lanly confessed to the crew's accusations and did not mean to admit mistakes in the slightest. That upright posture seemed to take everything for granted; and at the end, Cornell said, " The journalist sent by our journal once again gave Lan Li the opportunity to explain his rebuttal, but he refused.
Throughout the article, Cornell’s Lan Li shows a sense of pretentiousness, arrogance, and arrogance, which coincides with the previous revelations in the "anti-cancer me" crew. Ignoring the rest of the matter, completely focused on the revelations of the crew and vividly portrayed Lan Li's arrogant personality.
In addition, "Entertainment Weekly" has many allies
"Len Li-Hall admits all the accusations frankly and refuses to repent", "Shirking responsibility, Ren Li and reporters officially launched", "Made at the Kardashian family, Lan Li provoked disputes again", "Arrogant and confident : I got the nomination based on my own strength", "Hall admits that he has a close relationship with Spielberg and Hanks", "Malicious hype? This is just the beginning"...
These condemning reports are really not a few, and they have brought out the profound meaning of the out of context. The same sentence, after switching different perspectives, will also interpret different answers, not to mention a meeting full of content. They didn't lie, what they reported was the facts, but the result was completely different from the atmosphere at the reporter's meeting.
One pen can change the whole world. This is the fundamental reason why journalists are called "Uncrowned Kings".
However, compared to the media that has become more critical and critical, the media that reverses arrows and changes opinions have an absolute advantage, and in a short time, it reverses the direction of the entire report.
"Len Li-Hall: The crew never thought about hype. So, who is making trouble?"
"Being fully focused on the new filming, the'anti-cancer me' is worth looking forward to."
"Another victim of entertaining to death: Renly Hall. Who is in charge of all this?"
"A single-minded performance fanatic, but accidentally contracted a terminal illness? Is this a new method of college public relations, or is it the cruel persecution of jealous eyes?"
"Reject the hype and focus on acting. Lanly-Hall responded to doubts with practical actions."
"Facts speak louder than words, time has its own arbitrariness! Deep in the whirlpool, Lanly-Hall shows a rare and precious grandeur!"
...
These supporters were more angry than one, and more excited than the other, as if they did not participate in the previous fall into the trap. They were eager to stand up and wave the flag for Lan Li. If possible, they would even give Lan Li a "Love Post". The banner of "Dedication" expresses one's sincerity.
Not only that, but Bradley Adams of The New York Times published an editorial with the title "Renley-Hall's Sorrow. Who is helping it!"
In this article, Bradley pointed the arrow sharply at the uncrowned king who "lost the pursuit of the truth itself because of entertainment to death". He emphasized that Lan Li had never thought about hype, let alone using his background. Making essays has repeatedly become a tool for interested people to concoct news focus. This is a sad and sad fact for the news industry in the fast-food era.
"When Lanly-Hall devoted himself to filming, the media continued to harass the stability of the crew; when Lanly-Hall devoted himself to character research, the media sought their own interests in the name of justice; -When Hall refused to join in the dirty work, the media ignored the dirty water.
‘I sincerely hope that reporters don’t pay attention to our crew, and don’t pay attention to me. Let us put our work into work. ’
These are the original words of Lan Li-Hall in the interview. What kind of dilemma did he face that led to these words? It is worth thinking about by everyone. "
This "New York Times" article laid the tone and trend of the entire news, outlined the background of the era of entertainment to death, and really aimed the spearhead at the media itself, which is not to compromise in order to create explosions, especially "Entertainment Weekly" instantly became the target of countless netizens. This time, they also tasted the taste of Lan Li.
Before that, the netizens who had been condemning Lanli directly pointed their guns at "Entertainment Weekly" without any buffering ground, just like a goldfish, with only seven seconds of memory, no guilt, no burden, There is no entanglement. To be precise, without any consciousness, go with the flow and begin to criticize new objects. However, this time "Entertainment Weekly" just hit the gun.
In addition, Daisy Lucas of Vanity Fair followed this incident from a different perspective.
"The seven deadly sins of Lanly-Hall have conquered Hollywood's desire/hope symbol~www.novelhall.com~ This is the title of a column written by Daisy. In the article, Daisy believes that the beginning of the "Pacific War" By the upcoming Oscar, although Lan Li has only appeared in front of the public for only one year, the talent, talent, temperament and personality displayed by Lan Li have made people yearn for it, and easily gained a good popularity. This made Lanli a target of public criticism and triggered a wave of opposition this time.
Daisy cited the so-called "seven deadly sins", but she was actually praising Lan Li, thinking that Lan Li had succeeded in occupying a place in Hollywood with her charm and strength. Such a posture turned out to make people eye-catching.
But at the same time, Daisy also believes that Lanly needs to prove himself further. It proves that "buried alive" and "love crazy" are not just a flash in the pan, prove that the Oscar nomination can withstand the test, and it also proves that absolute strength will shine after all.
"Maybe, the'anti-cancer me' can't bear the weight of refuting the doubt; but Lan Li, who is dedicated and dedicated to acting, has already proved his identity as an actor. He is just an actor."
"Vanity Fair" expressed its solidarity with Lan Li in a gimmicky yet sincere way.
After the reporter's meeting, this time the "Ren Li-Hall" incident seemed to have become more and more intense. The media began to verbalize, and both the pros and the cons refused to give up, although the current support for Lan Li was occupied It has the upper hand, and still has an absolute advantage, but the opposition is not timid and unswervingly continues its protest gesture.
Bustling and lively, everyone's eyes temporarily left Seattle, but began to spread toward the entire North America. Not only the paper media, but also the Internet, even the talk show can not help but join the ranks of ridicule, things seem to get worse.
The door of the apartment fell into a weird silence, and you could even hear the wind whistling in your ears. This is for a press conference, for a press conference with menacing siege and suppression, for the mighty and arrogant Hollywood expedition, it is a great shame.Lan Li looked around for a week, leaving enough time, and found that the reporters still had no plans to speak out, so he smiled and nodded, "Then, that's it for today. The crew still has work, so don't delay everyone. I'm working." After speaking, Lan Li turned around and left and returned to the apartment.Today Lanly's response is really unexpected time and time again. Lanly seems to totally ignore the negative news. If it weren't for the repeated persecution of reporters, Lanly would still not respond. . Is such a frank and honest way of responding really stupid and naive? Or do those who clean up clean themselves? But whatever it was, it pushed the reporters into an extremely embarrassing situation.Is this follow-up report a newspaper? Still not reporting it?Dangling, the door of the peacock-blue apartment was closed, completely cutting off the reporters' sights, and then everyone looked at each other, embarrassed, and finally bowed their heads and hurriedly turned to leave. The hustle and bustle of the crowd just dispersed silently.But after leaving, the impact of today's press conference has just begun to ferment.Work, work, or work. This is the last sentence of Lan Li's conclusion of the press conference. Both inside and outside the words are emphasized: The "anti-cancer me" crew does not need to hype, and refuses to hype. I hope the news media can stop and return to their regular work. , Don't keep chasing after others.So, it's the media making and taking it from beginning to end?Just thinking of this possibility, everyone's stomach is a little hot. Think about it carefully, how did this news get to this point? First the "National Inquirer", then the official statement of the crew, and then... "Entertainment Weekly"? Damn "Entertainment Weekly"!Cornell, sitting in the driver's seat, could no longer restrain his anger. He picked up the orange juice next to him and poured it down his throat fiercely, but when it was poured, the uncontrollable anger exploded. , Tightening his fist, squeezed the entire plastic bottle, the orange juice inside was spilled everywhere, but he couldn't take care of it at all.Suddenly, the chills all jumped up, one after another. Then Cornell started sneezing, couldn't stop, and all the anger disappeared without a trace. What is going on with this inexplicable resentment?On the way out of the apartment, almost all reporters started to have trouble: how should this news be written?During the whole meeting, they were ridiculed fiercely for a while. It was almost 18 martial arts taking turns to battle. They could almost be said to be weak and incomplete. This embarrassing situation is really ashamed.So now, how should they report? This is a problem, a serious problem, but for the uncrowned king, things have never been so complicated. All they need to do is to choose a position.There is no need to wait until the next day. In the afternoon, the news exploded like a mushroom cloud, pushing the recent wave of news to a new peak.On the whole, the reporters were divided into two factions, one faction intensified, and the other faction turning arrows."Entertainment Weekly" deserves to be a critical camp, "Renly-Hall: Yes, those are true." Just this one title is already scary enough.In the article, Cornell emphasized that Lanly confessed to the crew's accusations and did not mean to admit mistakes in the slightest. That upright posture seemed to take everything for granted; and at the end, Cornell said, " The journalist sent by our journal once again gave Lan Li the opportunity to explain his rebuttal, but he refused.Throughout the article, Cornell's Lan Li shows a sense of pretentiousness, arrogance, and arrogance, which coincides with the previous revelations in the "anti-cancer me" crew. Ignoring the rest of the matter, completely focused on the revelations of the crew and vividly portrayed Lan Li's arrogant personality.In addition, "Entertainment Weekly" has many allies"Len Li-Hall admits all the accusations frankly and refuses to repent", "Shirking responsibility, Ren Li and reporters officially launched", "Made at the Kardashian family, Lan Li provoked disputes again", "Arrogant and confident : I got the nomination based on my own strength", "Hall admits that he has a close relationship with Spielberg and Hanks", "Malicious hype? This is just the beginning"...These condemning reports are really not a few, and they have brought out the profound meaning of the out of context. The same sentence, after switching different perspectives, will also interpret different answers, not to mention a meeting full of content. They didn't lie, what they reported was the facts, but the result was completely different from the atmosphere at the reporter's meeting.One pen can change the whole world. This is the fundamental reason why journalists are called "Uncrowned Kings".However, compared to the media that has become more critical and critical, the media that reverses arrows and changes opinions have an absolute advantage, and in a short time, it reverses the direction of the entire report."Len Li-Hall: The crew never thought about hype. So, who is making trouble?""Being fully focused on the new filming, the'anti-cancer me' is worth looking forward to.""Another victim of entertaining to death: Renly Hall. Who is in charge of all this?""A single-minded performance fanatic, but accidentally contracted a terminal illness? Is this a new method of college public relations, or is it the cruel persecution of jealous eyes?""Reject the hype and focus on acting. Lanly-Hall responded to doubts with practical actions.""Facts speak louder than words, time has its own arbitrariness! Deep in the whirlpool, Lanly-Hall shows a rare and precious grandeur!"...These supporters were more angry than one, and more excited than the other, as if they did not participate in the previous fall into the trap. They were eager to stand up and wave the flag for Lan Li. If possible, they would even give Lan Li a "Love Post". The banner of "Dedication" expresses one's sincerity.Not only that, but Bradley Adams of The New York Times published an editorial with the title "Renley-Hall's Sorrow. Who is helping it!"In this article, Bradley pointed the arrow sharply at the uncrowned king who "lost the pursuit of the truth itself because of entertainment to death". He emphasized that Lan Li had never thought about hype, let alone using his background. Making essays has repeatedly become a tool for interested people to concoct news focus. This is a sad and sad fact for the news industry in the fast-food era."When Lanly-Hall devoted himself to filming, the media continued to harass the stability of the crew; when Lanly-Hall devoted himself to character research, the media sought their own interests in the name of justice; -When Hall refused to join in the dirty work, the media ignored the dirty water.I sincerely hope that reporters don't pay attention to our crew, and don't pay attention to me. Let us put our work into work. 'These are the original words of Lan Li-Hall in the interview. What kind of dilemma did he face that led to these words? It is worth thinking about by everyone. "This "New York Times" article laid the tone and trend of the entire news, outlined the background of the era of entertainment to death, and really aimed the spearhead at the media itself, which is not to compromise in order to create explosions, especially "Entertainment Weekly" instantly became the target of countless netizens. This time, they also tasted the taste of Lan Li.Before that, the netizens who had been condemning Lanli directly pointed their guns at "Entertainment Weekly" without any buffering ground, just like a goldfish, with only seven seconds of memory, no guilt, no burden, There is no entanglement. To be precise, without any consciousness, go with the flow and begin to criticize new objects. However, this time "Entertainment Weekly" just hit the gun.In addition, Daisy Lucas of Vanity Fair followed this incident from a different perspective."The seven deadly sins of Lanly-Hall have conquered Hollywood's desire/hope symbol~www.novelhall.com~ This is the title of a column written by Daisy. In the article, Daisy believes that the beginning of the "Pacific War" By the upcoming Oscar, although Lan Li has only appeared in front of the public for only one year, the talent, talent, temperament and personality displayed by Lan Li have made people yearn for it, and easily gained a good popularity. This made Lanli a target of public criticism and triggered a wave of opposition this time.Daisy cited the so-called "seven deadly sins", but she was actually praising Lan Li, thinking that Lan Li had succeeded in occupying a place in Hollywood with her charm and strength. Such a posture turned out to make people eye-catching.But at the same time, Daisy also believes that Lanly needs to prove himself further. It proves that "buried alive" and "love crazy" are not just a flash in the pan, prove that the Oscar nomination can withstand the test, and it also proves that absolute strength will shine after all."Maybe, the'anti-cancer me' can't bear the weight of refuting the doubt; but Lan Li, who is dedicated and dedicated to acting, has already proved his identity as an actor. He is just an actor.""Vanity Fair" expressed its solidarity with Lan Li in a gimmicky yet sincere way.After the reporter's meeting, this time the "Ren Li-Hall" incident seemed to have become more and more intense. The media began to verbalize, and both the pros and the cons refused to give up, although the current support for Lan Li was occupied It has the upper hand, and still has an absolute advantage, but the opposition is not timid and unswervingly continues its protest gesture.Bustling and lively, everyone's eyes temporarily left Seattle, but began to spread toward the entire North America. Not only the paper media, but also the Internet, even the talk show can not help but join the ranks of ridicule, things seem to get worse.
